Here’s a lovely little animation about Sheffield’s street trees created by University student Mike Burgess.
Here’s a lovely little animation about Sheffield’s street trees created by University student Mike Burgess.
STAG is not a party political organisation, however we are aware that tree felling has become a political issue for many of our supporters. In this spirit we have invited all local candidates to respond to the issues presented in the Street Tree Manifesto so that voters can judge for themselves.
The time available to organise all this has been brief and, due to difficulties in making contact, many of the candidates only received our request on 25th April. We appreciate that this does not allow much time for candidates to reply but hope that they will engage with our request.
We will update the links below as and when new information comes in.
Beauchief & Greenhill; Beighton; Birley; Broomhill & Sharrow Vale; Burngreave; City; Crookes & Crosspool; Darnall; Dore & Totley; East Ecclesfield; Ecclesall; Firth Park; Fulwood; Gleadless Valley; Graves Park; Hillsborough; Manor Castle; Mosborough; Nether Edge & Sharrow; Park & Arbourthorne; Richmond; Shiregreen & Brightside; Southey; Stannington; Stocksbridge & Upper Don; Walkley; West Ecclesfield; Woodhouse.
Labour & Liberal Democrats response for wards without individual candidate responses.

Labour-led Sheffield City Council stands accused of carrying out covert surveillance operations against residents and campaigners, during the ongoing dispute over the chopping down of trees in the city.
Information passed to The Canary details allegations against the council. These include collusion with police and the possible leaking of court evidence to a local newspaper, all in the hope of catching tree campaigners breaking the law.
But the most worrying part of the story is that campaigners believe the council may have broken the law, by hiring a private investigator to spy on residents and protesters.
Sheffield City Council and its contractor Amey are chopping down public trees in the city. Local residents aren’t happy because of the environmental impact, the “Thatcherite” behaviour of the Labour council, and public health concerns. As The Canary has been documenting, people have been campaigning against the felling of trees
There have been ongoing protests from campaigners, opposition councillors and residents over the programme. These demonstrations have been highly charged: one saw two pensioners arrested, and another saw local residents reportedly face off against over 30 police officers, private security and heavy plant machinery.
The council paused the tree-felling programme on 26 March. As The Guardian reported, it said it was doing this due to:
The actions of a handful of people unlawfully entering the safety zones where tree replacement work is being carried out.
After The Canary released details of emails showing the close relationship between South Yorkshire police and Amey, now Sheffield City Council is at the centre of another controversy.
Sheffield City Council had previously denied that it conducts surveillance on residents and campaigners. This surveillance includes photography and filming at sites where tree felling is taking place. It also includes ‘trawling’ social media. But a series of Freedom of Information requests (FOIs) by campaigners eventually forced the council to release some details of its operations.
The FOIs show that in March 2017 the council did an assessment of how and why it would do surveillance operations. It shows that the council authorised its staff and subcontractors to photograph and video residents and campaigners; specifically with the intention of taking them to court. It said the recording can take place at “council depots or in public areas”. The document also authorised the trawling of social media
The council document is part of an official application form [pdf] requesting authorisation for “direct surveillance” under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). The council claimed that the document was an “evidence gathering protocol” as part of its preparations for court proceedings, not an application under RIPA.
But further to the council carrying out surveillance, it also hired a private investigator to monitor campaigners. This is where campaigners feel that it appears the council may have broken the law.
Another FOI revealed that the council hired private investigatory firm Douglas H. Savage to carry out surveillance on residents and campaigners. The council has not confirmed what the firm did. But a Facebook post hints at the private investigator’s operations, and why the council hired it:

It is clear that campaigners knew they were being ‘snooped’ on, as this Facebook post was before the first FOI regarding the use of a private investigator. The council would not confirm or deny that the investigator was gathering court evidence. But it was even less transparent about the cost.
In the first FOI, the council said that:
Up to 9th October [2017] the cost of the collecting evidence was met by Sheffield City Council. As from this date the costs will be met by Amey.
But also in that FOI, and in a subsequent one, it said it did not hold copies of invoices from the private investigator. It claimed that Amey had them. Meanwhile, the government is threatening to dissolve Douglas H. Savage, as it has not filed any accounts since 2015. It begs the questions: how much did the council/Amey pay Douglas H. Savage? And where did that money go?
Green Party councillor Alison Teal was taken to court by Sheffield City Council over her campaigning on the tree felling programme. She believes that the surveillance operations run deeper than just photographs, filming and private investigators. She told The Canary:
I first became aware of the extent of Amey/Sheffield council surveillance when I received the bundle of evidence they were presenting against me at the injunction hearing last year. There were multiple photographs taken of campaigners on the streets, and excerpts of social media conversations. We found out the council had staff dedicated to monitoring social media, and I’ve grown accustomed to being filmed at protests. I have another court hearing on 30 April and conversations I had on site with a defendant are part of the evidence.
Council staff have been in the onsite police operations van, and we’ve seen Amey staff briefing the police. They’re all in this together. The ‘authorities’ are acting in concert to detain, discredit, demonise and derail the campaign. Community opinion is of no consequence where money is to be made, it seems.
But this is not the whole story. Because according to campaigners the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is currently investigating Sheffield City Council over two matters. Firstly, it is looking into whether the council has breached FOI rules.
Secondly, the ICO is allegedly looking into the council leaking information relating to a court case to local media site The Star. Specifically, campaigners claim that an article published on 11 October 2017 contained a still image of protesters at the site of tree felling. In emails seen by The Canary, The Star confirmed the image was provided by the council. But because the image was from the council’s official surveillance, it may have breached data protection laws. The Canaryasked the ICO for comment but received none.
Sheffield City Council told The Canary:
Regrettably, following an increase in criminal activity and continued breaches of a High Court injunction around essential tree works, the council agreed that Amey could undertake overt filming to gather evidence for court around work safety zones. This was communicated with the public and protesters at the time, to ensure those being filmed were aware of the situation, and a notice was placed on the council’s website [here].
Approval under The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) was never given because the council never agreed to covert surveillance. Amey were asked by the council to film overtly to gather evidence for court.
But campaigners claim “overt filming” is not what the council admitted to in the FOIs. The use of a private investigator, paid for by a public body (i.e. a council) would fall under RIPA rules if it was for what’s technically called directed and covert surveillance. The Facebook post above, and testimony told to The Canary, makes campaigners think the council’s surveillance was direct and covert.
One local resident and campaigner told The Canarythat they had been directly targeted by a private investigator. The incident happened around 150-250m away from a felling site. The alleged private investigator took photos of the campaigner’s face, after they removed a scarf they were wearing to conceal their identity. The photographs also included images of their son.
But the campaigner had no previous knowledge that this happened. Nor were they aware that private investigators were gathering evidence away from the felling area. They told The Canary they did not notice anyone wearing “hi-vis” jackets away from the felling site.
The only reason the campaigner knew that they had been photographed was because the council later issued them with a court summons for breaching its injunction orders on felling sites. The campaigner says the photographs were part of the basic evidence against them to pursue the case. But the case was immediately thrown out by a judge.
If the council was conducting direct and covert surveillance using a private investigator, it did not request authorisation from the government [pdf, p49/50]. This could mean it has broken the law, unless it can prove that it did not pay Douglas H. Savage before and up until 9 October 2017. Or unless it can show that the company was not carrying out direct or covert surveillance.
Teal summed up the situation by telling The Canaryshe believes Sheffield City Council may have acted “illegally”:
The partnership between the council and Amey is so enmeshed it appears they’ve lost perspective. It’s no longer clear to them, let alone us, who is responsible for what, and why. They’ve given confused replies to enquiries from journalists, and struggle to be cognisant about the facts.
It’s my belief that they’ve been reckless in their pursuit of campaigners. They’ve misused their powers, perhaps illegally, and now seek to hide the truth. This demonstrates an arrogant and complacent approach to their public duty. As well as a wanton waste of public money. They must be held accountable for their decisions and actions.
Another campaigner Marcus Combie told The Canary:
Safeguards and assurances given by the council when signing off on the surveillance have not been adequate. There have been disclosures from the protocol to generate media coverage. Also, there has been no oversight and investigation of leaked data. And the reports of people being followed by private investigators acting on behalf of Sheffield City Council raises some troubling legal issues.
The Sheffield trees ‘saga’ has the makings of a motion picture. From private investigators, to massive police operations via redacted documents and some celebrity campaigners – Sheffield has become the eye of a political storm. With the local elections just over a week away, Labour’s position in the city is looking more and more precarious.
Get Involved!
– Read more of The Canary‘s coverage on the Sheffield trees saga.
Featured image via Sheffield City Council – screengrab

Many, many voters in Sheffield are angry about the vast, unaccountable PFI contract between Sheffield City Council and Amey. Their reasons vary. It may be the shocking contractual requirement to fell half the city’s street trees (17,500 trees), even if they are healthy. It may be the memorial trees — like the planned fellingof the Western Road trees, or the sudden felling of the Frecheville ones, all planted in honour of fallen soldiers. It may be the draconian reaction to protest, including Amey’s hiring a private army of securityguards using violence on protestors. Or the expensive deployment of 30police officers at a time in the service of a private company, while knife crime is on the rise and a man is murdered in broad daylight. Or perhaps the nature of the arrests made — an opposition councillor (twice — both efforts failed), a 73 year old fireman (for intimidation — charges dropped), a vicar with a tambourineand several pensioners (swiftly de-arrested), two middle-aged women with plastic instruments (at least one of whom is still awaiting both charges and the return of her toy trumpet). It may be the deception andconcealment so much at odds with democratic accountaibility. Or simply the loss of so many perfectly healthy trees without good reason. But many people are fed up and want change. It’s not always obvious, though, how to vote to get that change. This brief article aims to offer some suggestions.
Part 1: Whatever you do, don’t vote Labour. (I write this, with sadness, as a current supporter of the national Labour Party, and — due to the trees — a former party member.)
Here is the first thing to know. Labour claims, over and over, that its victory in last year’s Nether Edge by-election showed that people want the felling programme, and all that is being done to support it (including massive police deployments and efforts to jail peaceful protestors). Let that sink in. That alone should give you pause before voting Labour.
But you need to know more. You need to know both how that election came to happen and why Labour won the narrow victory it did. That election happened because our council has what it calls a “Strong Leader” model. (Why yes, it does sound like a euphemism.) Nether Edge Labour Councillor Nasima Akther abstained from a vote on the trees rather than voting the way that the Strong Leader wanted her to. As a result, she was suspended, and then shortly after stepped down.
Labour won for two reasons. First, its opposition was split between the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. It was genuinely unclear from the party literature who to vote for if you cared about the trees (in fact the issue was most prominent in the Liberal Democrat literature). Second, Jim Steinke (the winning candidate) appeared to genuinely care about getting to a solution that would work for all parties to the tree dispute. Some Labour-supporting people who care about trees believed him. Their belief has been rewarded by the Labour Party claim that any vote for Steinke was a vote in support of the council’s tree felling programme. (And a massive crackdown on peaceful protest rather than any progress on negotiation.)
Now that it’s election time, Labour candidates are making similar claims again. But anyone who opposes the contract and the council’s behavior needs to know that however lovely a Labour candidate seems:
(1) The “Strong Leader” model means that they are unable to actually make any difference. If they try, they will be suspended.
(2) A vote for Labour is interpreted (and touted) as a vote for felling, and for all the anti-democratic actions taken in support of felling.
So, if you’re not voting Labour, who should you vote for?
Part 2: Vote tactically.
It is extremely hard to get a non-Labour candidate elected in Sheffield. It’s even harder in a multi-party system. The only way to send a message is to elect a non-Labour candidate, and the only way to do that is to vote tactically.
Fortunately, there’s a new initiative to help us do that. It’s Our City is a non-party-political community group dedicated to restoring democracy in Sheffield, who have done a lot of research that we can draw on. They have selected six winnable wards, and chosen candidates who signed up to their five excellent pledges (one of which is to work to end the PFI contract). The upshot is clear for six wards:
Broomhill and Sharrow Vale: Kaltum Rivers (Green)
City: Martin Phipps (Green)
Crookes and Crosspool: Mohammed Mahroof (Liberal Democrats)
Mosborough: Gail Smith (Liberal Democrats)
Nether Edge and Sharrow: Alison Teal (Green)
Walkley: Bernard Little (Green)
But there are other wards as well with candidates very much worth supporting, like Paul Turpin (Green) in Gleadless Valley.
One way to find out which parties have the best chance at winning is to look at the histories of the various wards. Here’s a page that tells you, by ward, how the last council elections went in 2016.
Part 3: Keep working for the trees and for democracy, even after the election.
Change does not come easily, especially under the “Strong Leader” model. Stay involved — write letters, sign petitions, go to council meetings, protest, and talk to your friends and neighbours about the need for change. The trees contract has helped to reveal the deeply unaccountable way that our city is run, but this is about so much more than trees: it’s about putting the repressive power of the police in the service of a multinational corporation.
As Yanis Varoufakis said when he was in Sheffield last week, “You need to start somewhere. You start with your local council. You save your trees. Then you take over 10 Downing Street and then you influence the world.”
Original article here:

Hello,
Mediated Talks (ish!):
It has been quite a hectic week despite the pause in felling. You may have seen that STAG invited Sheffield Council, Amey, and South Yorkshire Police to open talks, having booked a room at Kenwood Hall, and an independent mediator, as well as the media. This was yesterday (Friday). In the event, Sheffield Council and Amey failed to turn up. So the event focused on the Police, and whether they were acting in a balanced and proportional way. Chris Rust, Paul Brooke asked some quite pointed questions, which were clearly not given full answers. See here.
Legal pursuit of Sheffield Council:
At the meeting, it was also announced that STAG are pursuing a number of legal angles to hold Sheffield Council to account. The most well developed one is a potential Judicial Review of the Council’s decision not to rescind the PFI contract, despite having the option to without any financial penalties, and despite repeated and ongoing serious health and safety breaches. In that regard, a “warning letter” was sent yesterday to Sheffield Council by solicitors acting on instruction from members of the campaign, ahead of seeking advice from barristers.
Sheffield Council’s 5 Year Tree Strategy “sham”:
In addition, in case you missed it, the Yorkshire Post ran an important article based on a Freedom of Information (FoI) request we had put in a while back. The answer to the FoI request proved that the Five Year Tree Strategy that lists the 14 supposedly free engineering solutions is a worthless piece of paper, as it is superseded by what is contained in the PFI contract, which Sheffield Council still insist is not in the public’s interest to reveal. This and other FoI questions have proved that at least 8 of the 14 engineering solutions are ruled out by the PFI contract and can’t be used.
All this shows that, despite the pause in felling, and despite the hint of positive noises, the campaign is not reducing the pressure on the Council. So that means all of us, and all of you, need to keep that pressure up.
Costly Police Operation:
Yorkshire Police has revealed it spent £47,000 on overtime in just one month as it sent dozens of extra officers to tree-felling operations in Sheffield, as we hear the only protester to be charged so far during that time has had his case against him dropped. The force made the decision to send additional officers to work following what it termed as “disorder and violence” in January after clashes between protesters and private security guards hired by council contractor Amey.
May Election:
One of the most important forms of pressure is through the voting system in the local elections. Postal Votes began arriving through people’s letterboxes this week. That means that some people will already have begun to return cast votes. For those still considering, it essential that you really think carefully who you vote for. A lot of people vote for the same party locally as they do nationally, when they are two very different things. We strongly advise all that are reading this email to vote for the most pro tree candidate in your ward, e.g in Nether Edge and Sharrow ward is Alison Teal.
If you still need more convincing, see this really fantastic video which features Alison in a good chunk of it:
Like we said last week, it is vital that you also do your best to persuade your friends, families and neighbours to do the same. There is very strong evidence to show that many people are swayed to vote for people they think many other people are also voting for. So if there are posters in windows of Alison Teal, and they hear that other people are voting Alison Teal, they are more likely to vote for Alison Teal themselves. So please get persuading others!
Upcoming Events – “Let’s Hear It for Trees” – Sunday 22nd April:
In terms of upcoming events, just another reminder about the “Let’s Hear It for Trees” musical event this Sunday 22nd April. Booking tickets ahead is preferred but there will be some tickets available at the door.
Plus early notice of the next Save Nether Edge Trees Supporters Meeting (Public Meeting) on Monday 30th April at 8pm. This time at Kenwood Hall, in the Terrace Room, so note the change of location.
And that’s it for this week, enjoy the rest of your weekend.
See our Facebook page for more topical discussions.

SHEFFIELD Council has already suffered considerable reputational damage through the mishandling of its now notorious tree-felling programme, a major failure of public policy which resulted in dozens of police officers and private security guards being deployed to normally quiet residential streets to support removal operations in the face of growing public outrage.
Work is currently on hold as contractor Amey, which is conducting the removals as part of a secretive £2.2bn highways maintenance contract running for 25 years, reviews the way felling is conducted in the wake of condemnation from across the political and social spectrum.
Much of the recent outcry has focused not just on the use of huge police numbers, but also the revelation that the ‘Streets Ahead’ contract signed in 2012 contains a target to fell 17,500 of the city’s 36,000 street trees and replace them with saplings.
This was only brought to light last month following the intervention of the Information Commissioner after a year-long Freedom of Information battle by campaigners
However, lessons do not appear to have been learned, with the council now refusing to publish its official contractual policy for tree replacement work on the grounds that keeping the information secret is for the “greater good”. The Yorkshire Post has now requested a review of this decision and intends to take the matter to the Information Commissioner should the council maintain its current stance.
The situation is simple; the council has continually insisted that felling takes place only as a “last resort”. If this is indeed the case, then publishing the official contractual policy will confirm the council’s publicly-stated position. However, if the contract tells a different story, it can only be for the “greater good” of the public and local democracy that this information is unearthed as soon as possible
Original article here : https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/the-yorkshire-post-says-rooting-out-the-truth-on-sheffield-trees-1-9126227

Sheffield Council has ruled it is in the “greater good” to keep its official policy for the controversial felling of thousands of the city’s street trees secret
The council has rejected a Freedom of Information request by The Yorkshire Post to see its currently-redacted ‘Highway Tree Replacement Policy’ contained in its £2.2bn PFI Streets Ahead contract with Amey. It said it is not in the public interest to reveal the policy while it is still reviewing what information in the deal can be released ahead of potential publication at an unspecified future date.
The response stated: “We believe the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure in this instance. “Please note, public interest is what is of greater good to the community and not what interests the public.”
It comes after it was revealed last month that the contract, which started in 2012 and will run for 25 years, contains a target to remove 17,500 of the city’s 36,000 street trees and replace them with saplings. Felling is currently on hold while Amey reviews its strategy following a national outcry after dozens of police officers and private security guards were sent to support operations and deal with protesters earlier this year.
Sheffield Council has previously insisted that felling is carried out as a “last resort” and published a ‘Five Year Tree Management Strategy’ in early 2016 which confirmed this position. The strategy, which covered 2012 to 2017 and is in the process of being updated, says trees will only be considered for removal if they fall into one of six categories; if they are dead, dying, diseased, dangerous, damaging or ‘discriminatory’ – affecting the ability of people to use the pavement.
However, a separate FoI response by the council to tree campaigner Paul Selby has confirmed that the strategy is superseded by what is contained within the contract. It states: “In the event of any inconsistencies between the documents [the PFI contract and the strategy document], the obligations contained in the Streets Ahead contract take precedence over any document produced under it.” Mr Selby said this admission appears to show the published strategy is “worthless” and highlights the importance of the contractual policy being released. He said this is backed up by analysis of the limited use of alternative options to save trees from being felled that are listed in the strategy document.
An ‘Independent Tree Panel’ was established by Sheffield Council in November 2015 to assess whether a list of engineering solutions contained within the strategy could be deployed as an alternative to felling threatened trees. Analysis of ITP documents by campaigners has found the panel subsequently recommended 307 trees out of the 802 they surveyed could potentially be saved using one of the 14 solutions.
However, campaigners say Sheffield Council employed these solutions on just 75 occasions and all of these temporarily.
Mr Selby said that evidence garnered from various FoIs and council reports suggests eight of the 14 solutions appear to have been ruled out for a variety of reasons. The council response to The Yorkshire Post in which it refused to disclose the contract section containing the Highway Tree Replacement Policy said the ongoing review of which parts of the 7,000-page Streets Ahead contract can be made public is “an arduous task and requires appropriate levels of scrutiny”. It said: “This information is intended in part for publication at some future date and it is reasonable in all the circumstances to withhold the information prior to publication.”
Mr Selby said this was not good enough, particularly given the contract has been in operation for six years. “All the contract needs to be released so we can get to the bottom of what the truth is.” When asked by The Yorkshire Post whether there is anything in the contract that confirms felling is a last resort, Sheffield Council said it would be making no further comment as it is currently working on an updated tree management strategy.
A council spokesperson said: “The strategy document is being worked on and will be released in due course. Until this document is finalised internally, we have nothing further to add.”
South Yorkshire Police has revealed it spent £47,000 on overtime in just one month as it sent dozens of extra officers to tree-felling operations in Sheffield – as the only protester to be charged so far during that time said the case against him dropped. The force made the decision to send additional officers to work following what it termed as “disorder and violence” in January after clashes between protesters and private security guards hired by council contractor Amey.
The new policy started from February 26 and continued until work was put on hold by Amey and the council on March 26 in the wake of a growing national outcry. Thousands of street trees are being removed in the city and replaced with saplings as part of the 25-year Streets Ahead highways maintenance contract between Sheffield Council and Amey but campaigners have argued that many healthy trees are being removed unnecessarily.
The revised police operation which started in late February saw over 30 officers being sent out on some days to accompany private security guards to felling operations, with almost 20 arrests of campaigners protesting against the removal of trees. In one of most-publicised incidents, a woman was arrested for blowing a toy horn under the Public Order Act.
One man, Justin Buxton, was charged with obstructing the highway and was due to appear in court next Tuesday but told The Yorkshire Post today he was informed on Friday afternoon that the case against him has been discontinued by the CPS. He said he had been arrested after crossing a road near to a tree-felling operation by some temporary traffic lights on the alleged grounds that both lights had to be turned to red because of where he was standing.
Speaking on Friday morning at a press conference organised by the Sheffield Tree Action Groups (STAG) and attended by representatives from South Yorkshire Police, Superintendent Paul McCurry said the force had attempted to use officers working on their normal shifts, with these costs part of the normal policing budget.

I heard a story this week of an old man and a cherry tree. The man was near the end of his life and could no longer go outside. He had visitors and he could watch television, but what anchored him most securely in the world beyond his home was the cherry tree by his window.
His son, Paul Meadows, wrote:
Often he would just sit and watch as the birds would come and go. The tree’s shadow would move around the room, climbing the walls, tracing shapes, marking the passing of the day, and the depth of shadow would change with the brightness of the season.
And of course there was the brief glory of the soft pink blossom.
The tree was a real thing, in the real world, that he could really see. It wasn’t on TV, it wasn’t a second-hand experience of the changing world, and it wasn’t something he found difficult to do.
A few days later, I went to visit some of the most famous cherry trees in my home city of Sheffield. It was damp and drizzly: fog on the hills and a raw, scouring edge to the air. But the trees on Abbeydale Park Rise were blooming as if in defiance of the weather: deep crimson shading to pale pink against the blank sky.
Last year I came to this street on a very different day: storybook spring, with bees buzzing all over the trees.



The weather wasn’t the only thing that was different this year. Compare the picture of the tree above, taken on 28 March 2017, with the one I took on Wednesday:

Amey has been here, the company that is locked to our council in a £2.2 billion PFI deal that will see 17,500 trees, most of them healthy, destroyed for no other reason than that it is cheaper for Amey to fell than to save. (I have written about this in previous posts, and there is excellent background information here.)
I went out to join campaigners on a couple of days in January, when crews of contractors were trying to fell in the road. These trees are not only famous for their blossom: every December, people come from miles around to see the fairy lights that residents hang in them. For some, it is simply ‘Christmas Street’.
It was nothing like Christmas on the freezing mornings when we were guarding the trees. The air was tense and heavy. People were talking in whispers. One apologised for calling a fellow campaigner – her neighbour – by his Christian name. ‘Sorry,’ she said. ‘I forgot we shouldn’t identify each other.’
Later, a woman was arrested for refusing to move away from a tree. Eventually the contractors gave up, but they came back and back and on one occasion lopped the branch from the tree in the picture, and several others in the road as well. Protestors stopped them from taking the rest.
For the people who go out day after day to defend our trees, the attrition can be severe. Just round the corner from the cherry trees is Chatsworth Road, which used to be an avenue of magnificent limes. Six have now been felled, all healthy.
People were in tears when they came down. One woman had been out every day from 6.30am to defend the tree near her house. This is what is left now:

Recently, a campaigner posted on the tree defenders’ Facebook page that he had been to his GP about symptoms related to anxiety. He thought they were set off by recent fellings, including those in Chatsworth Road. He went on
The GP (a very nice young man) told me that he has been treating multiple patients adversely affected by tree fellings and that his colleagues are too. This made me wonder how many GPs are caring for tree scandal casualties, across Sheffield and beyond? Many key campaigners I know have been very severely affected. And the number of folk in Sheffield suffering from stress, anxiety, depression & adrenal exhaustion specifically related to the unnecessary fellings of greatly loved, street trees – well, it must be staggering.
The Australian philosopher Glenn Albrecht coined a word for this kind of desolation. He called it ‘solastalgia’, a form of ‘psychic or existential distress caused by environmental change’. It’s similar to being homesick, but whereas homesickness can be cured by going home, there’s no cure for solastalgia. Pressures on the environment, such as climate change or – as in the case of Sheffield – so-called ‘development’, can alter a landscape so radically that ‘the home becomes unhomely around its inhabitants’, as the writer Robert Macfarlane has put it.
Albrecht has worked with people facing dramatic and catastrophic changes to their homes: the inhabitants of Upper Hunter in New South Wales, for example, where some of the biggest machines in the world are turning a landscape that used to be compared to Tuscany into an open cut coal mine extending over more than 500 square kilometres.
But Albrecht also recognised that solastalgia can afflict people whose homes are changing in less obviously dramatic ways. In a TED talk, he spoke of the importance of a relationship with ‘a tree outside your window’.
Which brings us back to Paul Meadows’ dad. Paul told his story in response to a student who wanted to know why trees were so important to Sheffield. Comparing his dad’s severely restricted life to that of the cherry tree, he wrote:
The small movements, the small changes, are like a living clock, and that can remind you that you are alive too.
Street trees are quotidian landmarks that punctuate both the space and the time in which we pass our everyday lives. To rip them out, as our council is doing, is to destroy not only the tree, but also something profoundly important to the identity of our city and to those of us who call Sheffield home.
There are ways of fighting solastalgia, and these ways have been evident in Sheffield for a while, actions that bring hope alongside the distress. Sunday, for example, will see a ‘blossom party’ on Abbeydale Park Rise, with music, pizza, and the chance to make art.
More on these acts of creative resistance in a future post!
Original article here :
https://joannadobson.com/2018/04/13/of-street-trees-and-solastalgia/

No felling:
So another week without felling has gone by, which has again been lovely. Conflicting rumours abound about whether the felling crews will be back next week or not. There are some hints that they might, and other rumours to the contrary. Either way, as ever, we should be vigilant.
Felling to resume?
There are parking restriction notices on Kenwood Road, a renowned conservation area, for example from the 16th to 18th April. This could of course be for stump grinding. But it could be to fell trees. Don’t forget that there is still one of the heavily night pruned trees still standing, which is absolutely saveable with rectifying pruning. So if the emergency callout occurs next week, please, as ever, do your best to attend, even if only for an hour. The more people attend, the more pressure is put on the felling crews, security and police.
Elsewhere another campaign Freedom of Information request has highlighted confidential emails revealing South Yorkshire Police taking orders from Amey, then lying to the media about it!
May Elections:
We are reliably informed that Postal Votes for the May local elections are due to be received in the next week or so, and that means that some people will begin to return cast votes next week. It is therefore essential that you seriously consider who you vote for. A lot of people vote for the same party locally as they do nationally, when they are two very different things. We strongly advise vote for the most pro tree candidate in your ward!
If you are doubting which way to vote, please remember that the ruling Labour cabinet used their marginal victory in the Nether Edge and Sharrow by-election last year as proof that residents favoured felling street trees.
It is also important that you do your best to persuade your friends, families and neighbours to do the same. There is very strong evidence to show that many people are swayed to vote for people they think many other people are also voting for. So if there are posters in windows of Alison Teal, and they hear that other people are voting Alison Teal, they are more likely to vote for Alison Teal themselves. So please get persuading others!
Upcoming events:
In terms of upcoming events, just a reminder about the “Let’s Hear It for Trees” musical event on Sunday 22nd April. Book tickets early if you do want to go.
Plus there is the Abbeydale Park Rise blossom party this Sunday at 3pm. If you haven’t seen how stunning the white blossom is before, we strongly recommend you go and see it. We were blown away by it last year, literally gorgeous.
Have a great weekend.

Mass arrests, poisoned-tea plots and the unravelling of a secret £2.2bn PFI contract. Colin Drury delves into the inside story of the battle to save 20,000 trees being felled in a single city
Jenny Hockey still shivers when she remembers the moment, almost 18 months ago, she was woken by police hammering at her door. It was 5am. When she looked outside, she momentarily wondered if a terror incident was unfolding.
“It was that kind of scene,” the 71-year-old says. “Multiple cars, officers swarming everywhere, flashing lights. We had no idea what was happening.”
It was 17 November 2016 and, under the cover of darkness, officers from South Yorkshire Police had descended on Sheffield’s Rustlings Road, one of the city’s most sought-after addresses. Cordoning off the street and banging on doors, they ordered residents to get dressed and move their vehicles or have them towed away. Within the hour, Hockey, a retired sociology professor, would become one of three neighbours arrested and locked up for eight hours.
But this dramatic pre-dawn raid – described by Nick Clegg, then the local MP, as like something “you’d expect in Putin’s Russia” – was not carried out in search of terrorists or criminals.
Rather, it was in support of council contractors hired to chop down eight street trees, which residents had spent more than a year petitioning to save.
Amid the confusion, Hockey and two others – including another woman in her seventies – attempted to stand under one of these century-old limes, only to be detained. All charges were later dropped.
“We wanted to protect something we loved,” she says. “And our right to do that – our democratic right – was taken away, really, by state force. It was so horrible and disempowering.”
Indeed, by the time the trio were freed, the trees which had always overlooked their homes were no more.
Yet a bigger battle was just beginning: one which has since spread across the city, seen mass protests and riot police on suburban streets, and ultimately revealed an astonishing secret plan – hidden within a £2.2bn PFI contract – to cut down almost 20,000 street trees…
Sheffield has long boasted of being Europe’s greenest city – in part because a third of it sits in the Peak District. But it is also due to the sheer number of trees that line the roads. Some 36,000 of them arch over highways and footpaths.
But around 2015, talk of what the Woodland Trust called a “tree massacre” started to emerge.
Company and council both said – and still say – such felling was necessary. Targeted trees, they argued, were either dying, dangerous or had roots causing irreparable damage to roads and footpaths. Every one taken down, they added, was being substituted with a younger sapling: “We assess every single tree and only replace them as a last resort,” says Darren Butt, account director with Amey, today.
Yet, as this felling increased, questions started to be asked. There was shock when two cherries commemorating Second World War heroes disappeared one day. At Christmas, a row decorated with charity festive lights were hacked back – with fellers cutting through wires and all.
A feeling spread that perfectly healthy and safe trees were being chopped unnecessarily. A suspicion grew that the policy was actually about increasing Amey’s profit margins. Over the length of the company’s 25-year highway maintenance obligations, so ran the theory, a newly planted sapling is far cheaper to look after than older, larger arboreta.
“People were going to work in the morning and coming home to entirely different-looking streets,” says Paul Selby, a city resident and leading member of Sheffield Tree Action Groups, known as Stag. “It was ecological destruction carried out, in secret, by a multinational company with the explicit support of the local authority and the police.
“And people were angry. These trees were part of their lives and they didn’t want them taking. These weren’t anarchists or hardline activists from other towns. They’re Sheffielders furious they hadn’t been given a voice in what was happening in their streets. So they came out and fought to be heard.”
Almost 6,000 trees have been chopped down. But in the face of overwhelming and increasingly nationalised pressure, a pause on felling was announced last week.
Sheffield City Council has put this down to the “dangerous tactics” of protestors. Yet the support in favour of Stag – both within the city and from names including Jeremy Corbyn, Michael Gove, Ken Loach and Jarvis Cocker – probably had something to do with it too.
Hopes are now high the whole policy can be reconsidered. “We don’t take anything for granted,” says Selby, a civil servant with the Department for Work and Pensions. “But, after so long fighting, surely dialogue is now the sensible way forward.”
Certainly, it has been a troubled road to here: the irony perhaps being that this all started with a real city victory.
In 2012 the government handed Sheffield £1.2bn to improve its roads, an economic godsend for a place locals had taken to calling Pothole City. Amey – a subsidiary of the Spanish company Ferrovial – won the work contract, promising to upgrade and maintain every highway, pavement, bridge, subway and street light for 25 years.
“This is work that is good for everyone living here,” says Paul Billington, director of culture and environment with the city council. “It is already bringing investment and opportunities back into the city because it is making our infrastructure world-class.”
Replacing damaging or dying trees, he argues, is key to that success continuing. Doing it now, he adds, is important because, as a 2007 survey showed, a large majority of trees are so old that to delay action would store problems for future generations.
And yet…
“No one disagrees that dying or damaging trees should be looked at – if they really do fall into those categories,” says Alison Teal, a Green Party councillor in the city. “But this went beyond that. We still didn’t know how many were due to come down but everywhere you looked, these magnificent trees were disappearing.”
Demonstrations were civil enough to start with. People at home would spot Amey vans and go out to stand under targeted trees so they couldn’t be axed. Others started taking the bus to work, leaving their cars blocking access to endangered arboreta.
Cups of tea were offered while people stood about. They debated the merits of the trees: their beauty, the environmental benefits, the wildlife. Occasionally, they talked about their favourite. An endangered elm in the Nether Edge area ended up being shortlisted for the 2016 England Tree Of The Year Award.
Yet things hardened after the Rustlings Road raid (“In hindsight, it was poorly handled,” says Darren Butt). While many still supported the replacement scheme, opinion started to harden in favour of the so-called tree-huggers. Stag membership doubled within the month.
“At that point people were really realising this isn’t just about trees, it’s about democracy and our right to a say on what happens in our streets,” says Teal, a psychologist by trade.
Demonstrations became feistier. Stumps of trees already cut were painted blood red as a mark of anger. Stag supporters – now numbering in their thousands – took to organising daily spotter patrols and flying pickets.
“When someone saw an Amey van near an endangered tree, they put a message in a WhatsApp group or online, and whoever was available would go and protect that tree,” says Teal.
In this way dozens of limes, cherries, oaks and birches across several neighbourhoods were saved.
But as tensions rose – with both fellers and protestors accusing each other of intimidation – police started to appear.
At one demonstration in leafy Chippinghouse Road in January 2017, nine people were arrested, some while stood in their own gardens. None were ever charged. At another picket last month, a specialist police protest removal unit turned up. It was the first time it had ever been deployed on South Yorkshire’s streets.
Arrest numbers grew – yet there were vaguely comedic elements to many. A 57-year-old woman was detained after blowing a pink trumpet, while a retired couple – Dr John and Sue Unwin – found themselves being questioned by CID officers (and later cleared) about the suspected poisoning of a cup of tea they gave a feller.
“It sounds like the plot from an Agatha Christie novel,” Dr Unwin told the Daily Mail.
One 73-year-old was detained for intimidation. Alan Simpson, a retired firefighter and great-grandfather, says: “I’ve never been in trouble in my life and was there with my wife. I don’t think I could have cut a less intimidating figure if I tried.” His charge, too, has been dropped.
“If it wasn’t so serious,” says James Whitworth, cartoonist on local newspaper The Star, “it would be farcical, and I mean that literally: there is enough material here to make an actual farce.
“As a cartoonist, it’s a dream because the whole thing is so ridiculous. You think you can’t possibly say anymore on the issue – and then they arrest a woman for blowing a plastic trumpet. But as a city resident: I’m pretty neutral but, really, maybe leave our trees alone?”
As news of the ongoing demonstrations spread, meanwhile, concern grew it was damaging the city’s reputation. When Sheffield was left off The Sunday Times Best Places to Live list this year, authorities blamed the campaigners: “it is regrettable the increasingly extreme actions of a small number of protestors is having this impact,” a council spokesperson declared.
Demonstrators themselves were not above ridiculous assertions either: at a packed council meeting, one compared Amey’s workers to Nazi guards, just doing their jobs.
“Not helpful,” admits Teal.
For now, however, the potential turning point arguably came in March when a freedom of information request, asked by Paul Selby, forced the council to reveal it had indeed asked for 17,500 trees to be chopped down. The figure was so astonishing all three city MPs – all Labour – called for a rethink.
In a disastrous interview on local radio, council cabinet member for environment Bryan Lodge – who declined to be interviewed for this piece – denied the figure was a target but could not explain what it actually was. Days later the suspension of felling was announced.
What happens next is the question the city is asking itself.
“We’ve already lost 6,000 trees,” says Selby. “Of course, there are some that should come down if they really are dying or doing irreversible damage to footpaths. But all other solutions should be sought first. Trees are a sign of a civilised city. We should be doing everything we can to save them.”

‘I salute you’ – that was the message from Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker as he returned to Sheffield to join hundreds of tree protesters in a march to the City Hall.
A downpour of rain did not stop hundreds of people of all ages from descending on the city centre in support of the campaign to stop controversial tree felling work planned by Sheffield City Council
“It’s great, it’s made me feel very proud of Sheffield. I don’t spend as much time as I used to in Sheffield, but I’m saluting you,” Jarvis said of the march.
He added: “Chopping down trees at 4am is a little bit surreptitious, you’re obviously not sure if what you’re doing is right.”
“I do think it’s a situation that requires communication from both sides.”
BBC Countryfile contributor, ‘Tree Hunter’ Rob McBride told the crowd: “This is the worst case of urban tree destruction on the planet.”
“The tree felling in this city is random, it’s indiscriminate. The council are out of their depth with the contract.”
“Egos and reputations are stalling progress in this city.”
“We will win, we will save the trees.”
Private contractor Amey is carrying out the work as part of Sheffield Council’s ‘Streets Ahead’ programme, a city wide road improvement programme.
It claims the trees earmarked for felling have been classed as dead, diseased or causing damage or obstruction – something the protesters dispute.
AS an enthusiastic tree-hugger – I have been President of the Woodland Trust for more than 12 years – I have found the unhappy saga of Sheffield taking an axe to so many of its roadside trees hard to countenance and even harder to understand.
If the answer to improving your city is to do away with more or less 50 per cent of the mature trees lining your residential streets, perhaps you’re asking the wrong question. Especially as by doing so, Sheffield is trashing its reputation as one of Europe’s greenest cities, just as a few Australian cricketers sandpapering a cricket ball have trashed their country’s reputation for sportsmanship
United in opposition to Sheffield’s radical tree surgery – or should the word be butchery? – are any number of local residents, national charities, eco-warriors, nature lovers, young and old, Jarvis Cocker, Nick Clegg and the Secretary of State for the Environment, Michael Gove. Quite a coalition, now joined by Gove’s shadow, Labour’s Sue Hayman. All want the destruction to be stopped or at any rate put on hold while a better solution is found
And like Christmas 1914 on the Western Front, a truce was declared over the Easter holiday, but, as in the First World War, the fear is the battle will resume afterwards.
And battle is the right word, as activists have taken to forming human shields to thwart the chainsaws, and police officers and security are deployed to hold back enraged residents as contractors do their worst.
<iframe frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” class=”i-amphtml-fill-content” src=”https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-18/html/container.html?n=0″ name=”1-0-18;11313;https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-18/js/ext.js(function(){var aa=”function”==typeof Object.create?Object.create:function(a){var b=function(){};b.prototype=a;return new b},n;if(“function”==typeof Object.setPrototypeOf)n=Object.setPrototypeOf;else{var p;a:{var ba={a:!0},q={};try{q.__proto__=ba;p=q.a;break a}catch(a){}p=!1}n=p?function(a,b){a.__proto__=b;if(a.__proto__!==b)throw new TypeError(a+” is not extensible”);return a}:null}var t=n,u=this,v=function(a,b){a=a.split(“.”);var c=u;a[0]in c||”undefined”==typeof c.execScript||c.execScript(“var “+a[0]);for(var d;a.length&&(d=a.shift());)a.length||void 0===b?c[d]&&c[d]!==Object.prototype[d]?c=c[d]:c=c[d]={}:c[d]=b},w=Date.now||function(){return+new Date};var y=document,A=window;var ca=Array.prototype.forEach?function(a,b){Array.prototype.forEach.call(a,b,void 0)}:function(a,b){for(var c=a.length,d=”string”==typeof a?a.split(“”):a,e=0;e<c;e++)e in d&&b.call(void 0,d[e],e,a)};var B=function(a){B[” “](a);return a};B[” “]=function(){};var C=function(a){try{var b;if(b=!!a&&null!=a.location.href)a:{try{B(a.foo);b=!0;break a}catch(c){}b=!1}return b}catch(c){return!1}},da=function(a,b){if(a)for(var c in a)Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(a,c)&&b.call(void 0,a[c],c,a)};var ea;ea=/^true$/.test(“”);var fa=function(a,b,c){a.addEventListener?a.addEventListener(b,c,void 0):a.attachEvent&&a.attachEvent(“on”+b,c)};var ha=function(a,b){a.google_image_requests||(a.google_image_requests=[]);var c=a.document.createElement(“img”);c.src=b;a.google_image_requests.push(c)};var ia=!!window.google_async_iframe_id,D=ia&&window.parent||window;var E=function(a){return{visible:1,hidden:2,prerender:3,preview:4,unloaded:5}[a.visibilityState||a.webkitVisibilityState||a.mozVisibilityState||””]||0},ka=function(a){var b;a.visibilityState?b=”visibilitychange”:a.mozVisibilityState?b=”mozvisibilitychange”:a.webkitVisibilityState&&(b=”webkitvisibilitychange”);return b};var F=null,G=!1,I=function(){this.g=y;this.o=A;this.j=!1;this.h=this.l=null;this.i=[];this.m=[];G?this.h=w():3==E(this.g)?(this.h=w(),la(this)):H(this)},H=function(a){if(!a.j){a.j=!0;for(var b=0;b<a.i.length;++b)a.u.apply(a,a.i[b]);a.i=[];for(b=0;b<a.m.length;++b)a.o.setTimeout(a.m[b],0);a.m=[]}},la=function(a){var b=function(){if(3!=E(a.g)){H(a);var b=ka(a.g);if(b&&a.l){var c=a.g,f=a.l;c.removeEventListener?c.removeEventListener(b,f,void 0):c.detachEvent&&c.detachEvent(“on”+b,f)}}};F&&(b=F(“di::vch”,b));a.l=b;var c=ka(a.g);c&&fa(a.g,c,b)};I.prototype.u=function(a){this.o.rvdt=this.h?w()-this.h:0;ha(this.o,a)};I.g=void 0;I.h=function(){return I.g?I.g:I.g=new I};var J=function(a,b,c){c=void 0===c?{}:c;this.error=a;this.context=b.context;this.line=b.line||-1;this.msg=b.message||””;this.file=b.file||””;this.id=b.id||”jserror”;this.meta=c};var ma=/^https?:\/\/(\w|-)+\.cdn\.ampproject\.(net|org)(\?|\/|$)/,na=function(a,b){this.g=a;this.h=b},oa=function(a,b){this.url=a;this.s=!!b;this.depth=null};var K=function(){this.i=”&”;this.j=!1;this.h={};this.l=0;this.g=[]},pa=function(a,b){var c={};c[a]=b;return[c]},ra=function(a,b,c,d,e){var f=[];da(a,function(a,k){(a=qa(a,b,c,d,e))&&f.push(k+”=”+a)});return f.join(b)},qa=function(a,b,c,d,e){if(null==a)return””;b=b||”&”;c=c||”,$”;”string”==typeof c&&(c=c.split(“”));if(a instanceof Array){if(d=d||0,d<c.length){for(var f=[],h=0;he?encodeURIComponent(ra(a,b,c,d,e+1)):”…”;return encodeURIComponent(String(a))},L=function(a,b,c,d){a.g.push(b);a.h[b]=pa(c,d)},ta=function(a,b,c,d){b=b+”//”+c+d;var e=sa(a)-d.length;if(0>e)return””;a.g.sort(function(a,b){return a-b});d=null;c=””;for(var f=0;f<a.g.length;f++)for(var h=a.g[f],k=a.h[h],g=0;g=l.length){e-=l.length;b+=l;c=a.i;break}else a.j&&(c=e,l[c-1]==a.i&&–c,b+=l.substr(0,c),c=a.i,e=0);d=null==d?h:d}}a=””;null!=d&&(a=c+”trn=”+d);return b+a},sa=function(a){var b=1,c;for(c in a.h)b=c.length>b?c.length:b;return 3997-b-a.i.length-1};var ua=function(a,b,c,d){if(Math.random()<(d||a.g))try{if(c instanceof K)var e=c;else e=new K,da(c,function(a,b){var c=e,d=c.l++;a=pa(b,a);c.g.push(d);c.h[d]=a});var f=ta(e,a.j,a.h,a.i+b+”&”);f&&ha(u,f)}catch(h){}};var M=null;var va=function(){var a=u.performance;return a&&a.now&&a.timing?Math.floor(a.now()+a.timing.navigationStart):w()},wa=function(){var a=void 0===a?u:a;return(a=a.performance)&&a.now?a.now():null};var xa=function(a,b,c){this.label=a;this.type=b;this.value=c;this.duration=0;this.uniqueId=this.label+”_”+this.type+”_”+Math.random();this.slotId=void 0};var N=u.performance,ya=!!(N&&N.mark&&N.measure&&N.clearMarks),O=function(a){var b=!1,c;return function(){b||(c=a(),b=!0);return c}}(function(){var a;if(a=ya){var b;if(null===M){M=””;try{a=””;try{a=u.top.location.hash}catch(c){a=u.location.hash}a&&(M=(b=a.match(/\bdeid=([\d,]+)/))?b[1]:””)}catch(c){}}b=M;a=!!b.indexOf&&0Math.random())},Aa=function(a){a&&N&&O()&&(N.clearMarks(“goog_”+a.uniqueId+”_start”),N.clearMarks(“goog_”+a.uniqueId+”_end”))};za.prototype.start=function(a,b){if(!this.g)return null;var c=wa()||va();a=new xa(a,b,c);b=”goog_”+a.uniqueId+”_start”;N&&O()&&N.mark(b);return a};var R=function(){var a=Q;this.h=Ba;this.j=this.i;this.g=void 0===a?null:a};R.prototype.pinger=function(){return this.h};var Ca=function(a,b,c,d,e){try{if(a.g&&a.g.g){var f=a.g.start(b.toString(),3);var h=c();var k=a.g;c=f;if(k.g&&”number”==typeof c.value){var g=wa()||va();c.duration=g-c.value;var l=”goog_”+c.uniqueId+”_end”;N&&O()&&N.mark(l);k.g&&k.h.push(c)}}else h=c()}catch(m){k=!0;try{Aa(f),k=(e||a.j).call(a,b,new S(V(m),m.fileName,m.lineNumber),void 0,d)}catch(x){a.i(217,x)}if(!k)throw m;}return h},Ea=function(a,b,c,d,e){var f=Da;return function(h){for(var k=[],g=0;g<arguments.length;++g)k[g]=arguments[g];return Ca(f,a,function(){return b.apply(c,k)},d,e)}};R.prototype.i=function(a,b,c,d,e){e=e||”jserror”;try{var f=new K;f.j=!0;L(f,1,”context”,a);b.error&&b.meta&&b.id||(b=new S(V(b),b.fileName,b.lineNumber));b.msg&&L(f,2,”msg”,b.msg.substring(0,512));b.file&&L(f,3,”file”,b.file);0<b.line&&L(f,4,”line”,b.line);var h=b.meta||{};if(d)try{d(h)}catch(T){}b=[h];f.g.push(5);f.h[5]=b;h=u;b=[];var k=null;do{d=h;if(C(d)){var g=d.location.href;k=d.document&&d.document.referrer||null}else g=k,k=null;b.push(new oa(g||””));try{h=d.parent}catch(T){h=null}}while(h&&d!=h);g=0;for(var l=b.length-1;g<=l;++g)b[g].depth=l-g;d=u;if(d.location&&d.location.ancestorOrigins&&d.location.ancestorOrigins.length==b.length-1)for(g=1;g<b.length;++g){var m=b[g];m.url||(m.url=d.location.ancestorOrigins[g-1]||””,m.s=!0)}var x=new oa(u.location.href,!1);l=null;var U=b.length-1;for(m=U;0<=m;–m){var r=b[m];!l&&ma.test(r.url)&&(l=r);if(r.url&&!r.s){x=r;break}}r=null;var Ha=b.length&&b[U].url;0!=x.depth&&Ha&&(r=b[U]);var z=new na(x,r);z.h&&L(f,6,”top”,z.h.url||””);L(f,7,”url”,z.g.url||””);ua(this.h,e,f,c)}catch(T){try{ua(this.h,e,{context:”ecmserr”,rctx:a,msg:V(T),url:z&&z.g.url},c)}catch(Ia){}}return!0};var V=function(a){var b=a.toString();a.name&&-1==b.indexOf(a.name)&&(b+=”: “+a.name);a.message&&-1==b.indexOf(a.message)&&(b+=”: “+a.message);if(a.stack){a=a.stack;var c=b;try{-1==a.indexOf(c)&&(a=c+”\n”+a);for(var d;a!=d;)d=a,a=a.replace(/((https?:\/..*\/)[^\/:]*:\d+(?:.|\n)*)\2/,”$1″);b=a.replace(/\n */g,”\n”)}catch(e){b=c}}return b},S=function(a,b,c){J.call(this,Error(a),{message:a,file:void 0===b?””:b,line:void 0===c?-1:c})},W=S;W.prototype=aa(J.prototype);W.prototype.constructor=W;if(t)t(W,J);else for(var X in J)if(“prototype”!=X)if(Object.defineProperties){var Fa=Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(J,X);Fa&&Object.defineProperty(W,X,Fa)}else W[X]=J[X];W.v=J.prototype;var Ba,Da;if(ia&&!C(D)){var Y=”.”+y.domain;try{for(;2<Y.split(“.”).length&&!C(D);)y.domain=Y=Y.substr(Y.indexOf(“.”)+1),D=window.parent}catch(a){}C(D)||(D=window)}var P=D,Q=new za,Ga=function(){if(!P.google_measure_js_timing){var a=Q;a.g=!1;a.h!=a.i.google_js_reporting_queue&&(O()&&ca(a.h,Aa),a.h.length=0)}};Ba=new function(){var a=void 0===a?A:a;this.j=”http:”===a.location.protocol?”http:”:”https:”;this.h=”pagead2.googlesyndication.com”;this.i=”/pagead/gen_204?id=”;this.g=.01};Da=new R;”complete”==P.document.readyState?Ga():Q.g&&fa(P,”load”,function(){Ga()});var Z=function(a,b,c,d,e){return Ea(a,b,c,d,e)};F=Z;G=ea;v(“vu”,Z(“vu”,function(a){a=a.replace(“&”,”&”);var b=/(google|doubleclick).*\/pagead\/adview/.test(a),c=I.h();if(b){b=”&vis=”+E(c.g);var d=a.indexOf(“&adurl”);a=-1==d?a+b:a.substring(0,d)+b+a.substring(d)}c.j?c.u(a):c.i.push([a])}));v(“vv”,Z(“vv”,function(){G&&H(I.h())}));}).call(this);vu(“https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/pcs/view?xai\x3dAKAOjsuYqPJCYLOw6Zvt0vcHYxDiKZCz-FjduUesU_dN7b6epVD8t9hs153aq6sHvw0Wwstxg0DnJKDsVPRjJTzB2UnljA99neTS2GA5BF50TPsisMvdgLlEAeANAtczPLfR65K7sPXc6OlybctH4Hbgt6yx0wXpxcAG4QneArmNgSUnt20Ul-5m7QOLl9vp0WzRvCNFMybUz4Ftxm0S-FHEG7IIEl8JCZUbqkfXWnEwZ9xX19uF23GFYJUcRVGhjmoDg2hzgB1D9RJQ\x26sig\x3dCg0ArKJSzGJ-KWXAgpoIEAE\x26urlfix\x3d1\x26adurl\x3d”)//a.teads.tv/page/48090/tag
(function() {
var iasScriptUrl, hiddenFrame, hiddenDoc, where, domain;
iasScriptUrl = ‘//pixel.adsafeprotected.com/jload?anId=9574&campId=300×1&pubId=314581213&chanId=135434293&placementId=710993293&pubCreative=113351255053&pubOrder=361460533&cb=1425252082&custom=’;
hiddenFrame = document.createElement(‘iframe’);
(hiddenFrame.frameElement || hiddenFrame).style.cssText = “width: 0; height: 0; border: 0; display: none;”;
hiddenFrame.src = ‘javascript:false’;
where = document.getElementById(‘ias-1425252082’);
where.parentNode.insertBefore(hiddenFrame, where);
try {
hiddenDoc = hiddenFrame.contentWindow.document
} catch (e) {
domain = document.domain;
hiddenFrame.src = “javascript:var d=document.open();d.domain='” + domain + “‘;void(0);”;
hiddenDoc = hiddenFrame.contentWindow.document
}
hiddenDoc.open().write(”);
hiddenDoc.close()
})();
{“uid”:0.9248669453962046,”hostPeerName”:”https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk”,”initialGeometry”:”{\”windowCoords_t\”:0,\”windowCoords_r\”:412,\”windowCoords_b\”:652,\”windowCoords_l\”:0,\”frameCoords_t\”:2049,\”frameCoords_r\”:402,\”frameCoords_b\”:2050,\”frameCoords_l\”:10,\”styleZIndex\”:\”\”,\”allowedExpansion_r\”:112,\”allowedExpansion_b\”:651,\”allowedExpansion_t\”:0,\”allowedExpansion_l\”:0,\”yInView\”:0,\”xInView\”:1}”,”permissions”:”{\”expandByOverlay\”:true,\”expandByPush\”:true,\”readCookie\”:false,\”writeCookie\”:false}”,”metadata”:”{\”shared\”:{\”sf_ver\”:\”1-0-18\”,\”ck_on\”:1,\”flash_ver\”:\”26.0.0\”,\”canonical_url\”:\”https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/clive-anderson-sheffield-needlessly-takes-an-axe-to-its-own-reputation-1-9102800\”}}”,”reportCreativeGeometry”:false,”isDifferentSourceWindow”:false,”sentinel”:”0-38359017001782105812″,”width”:300,”height”:1,”_context”:{“ampcontextVersion”:”1522422854768″,”ampcontextFilepath”:”https://3p.ampproject.net/1522422854768/ampcontext-v0.js”,”sourceUrl”:”https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/clive-anderson-sheffield-needlessly-takes-an-axe-to-its-own-reputation-1-9102800/amp?__twitter_impression=true”,”referrer”:”https://t.co/gIYBuTOV6A?amp=1″,”canonicalUrl”:”https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/clive-anderson-sheffield-needlessly-takes-an-axe-to-its-own-reputation-1-9102800″,”pageViewId”:”32″,”location”:{“href”:”https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/clive-anderson-sheffield-needlessly-takes-an-axe-to-its-own-reputation-1-9102800/amp?__twitter_impression=true”},”startTime”:1523119708228,”tagName”:”AMP-AD”,”mode”:{“localDev”:false,”development”:false,”minified”:true,”lite”:false,”test”:false,”version”:”1522422854768″,”rtvVersion”:”011522422854768″},”canary”:false,”hidden”:false,”initialLayoutRect”:{“left”:10,”top”:2049,”width”:392,”height”:1},”initialIntersection”:{“time”:4169.200000003912,”rootBounds”:{“left”:0,”top”:0,”width”:412,”height”:652,”bottom”:652,”right”:412,”x”:0,”y”:0},”boundingClientRect”:{“left”:10,”top”:1761,”width”:392,”height”:1,”bottom”:1762,”right”:402,”x”:10,”y”:1761},”intersectionRect”:{“left”:0,”top”:0,”width”:0,”height”:0,”bottom”:0,”right”:0,”x”:0,”y”:0},”intersectionRatio”:0},”domFingerprint”:”1229322425″,”experimentToggles”:{“canary”:false,”expAdsenseA4A”:false,”expDoubleclickA4A”:false,”expDfpCanonicalFf”:false,”expUnconditionedCanonical”:false,”dbclk_a4a_viz_change”:false,”a4aProfilingRate”:false,”ad-type-custom”:true,”ios-embed-wrapper”:true,”amp-apester-media”:true,”amp-ima-video”:true,”amp-playbuzz”:true,”chunked-amp”:true,”amp-auto-ads”:true,”amp-auto-ads-adsense-holdout”:false,”slidescroll-disable-css-snap”:true,”version-locking”:true,”a4aFastFetchDoubleclickLaunched”:false,”a4aFastFetchAdSenseLaunched”:false,”a4a-new-signature-verifier”:true,”pump-early-frame”:true,”a4a-measure-get-ad-urls”:false,”3p-use-ampcontext”:true,”amp-animation”:true,”amp-live-list-sorting”:true,”amp-sidebar toolbar”:true,”a4a-safeframe-preloading-off”:false,”expUnconditionedAdxIdentity”:false,”expUnconditionedDfpIdentity”:false,”expUnconditionedCanonicalHoldback”:false,”rollback-delayed-fetch-deprecation”:false,”rollback-dfd-ix”:true,”rollback-dfd-criteo”:true,”rollback-dfd-rubicon”:true,”rollback-dfd-navegg”:true,”rollback-dfd-openx”:true,”rollback-dfd-yieldbot”:true,”rollback-dfd-imonomy”:true,”rollback-dfd-pulsepoint”:true,”dcdf-whitelist-deprecation”:false},”sentinel”:”0-38359017001782105812″}}” height=”1″ width=”300″ data-amp-3p-sentinel=”0-38359017001782105812″ allowfullscreen=”allowfullscreen” allowtransparency=”” marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ style=”box-sizing: inherit; border: 0px !important; margin: auto; padding: 0px !important; display: block; height: 1px; max-height: 100%; max-width: 100%; min-height: 0px; min-width: 0px; width: 300px; transform: translate(-50%, -50%); top: 0px; left: 0px; position: absolute; bottom: 0px; right: 0px;”>
One of the main aims of the Woodland Trust is to preserve ancient woodland – areas of land on which trees have been growing for at least 400 years. In addition, the trust plants, and encourages others to plant, millions of new trees to increase the overall tree cover in the countryside.
But it is in towns and cities that most people come across trees in their everyday life. The beauty of a leafy suburb is more or less defined by its trees. In more urban areas, plenty of trees take their chance on the mean streets of the inner city, often locked up in metal cages for their own protection.
A haven for birds, and other wildlife, trees improve air quality, provide shade in the summer and alleviate flooding in wet weather. They are good for human health and are a joy to behold. You don’t need to be a tree-obsessive to appreciate the trees you see near your home or on your way to work
And like Christmas 1914 on the Western Front, a truce was declared over the Easter holiday, but, as in the First World War, the fear is the battle will resume afterwards.
And battle is the right word, as activists have taken to forming human shields to thwart the chainsaws, and police officers and security are deployed to hold back enraged residents as contractors do their worst.
One of the main aims of the Woodland Trust is to preserve ancient woodland – areas of land on which trees have been growing for at least 400 years. In addition, the trust plants, and encourages others to plant, millions of new trees to increase the overall tree cover in the countryside.
But it is in towns and cities that most people come across trees in their everyday life. The beauty of a leafy suburb is more or less defined by its trees. In more urban areas, plenty of trees take their chance on the mean streets of the inner city, often locked up in metal cages for their own protection.
A haven for birds, and other wildlife, trees improve air quality, provide shade in the summer and alleviate flooding in wet weather. They are good for human health and are a joy to behold. You don’t need to be a tree-obsessive to appreciate the trees you see near your home or on your way to work
Of course, this comes at a cost. But the cost of keeping long-established trees, as calculated by Sheffield City Council and its contractor Amey, is incredibly high. Or maybe just incredible.
Councillors are determined to remove thousands of mature trees because it – they calculate – is much cheaper to replace them with easier-to-manage whips and saplings. A pretty hard-hearted calculation, in any event, but are their calculations to be relied on, anyway?
Best known of the mature trees facing the chop is the Vernon Oak which has been growing in what is now a quiet cul-de-sac in Dore for about 150 years. Once upon a time it was surrounded by fields. Now it grows hard against the road.
For disturbing some kerbstones and other infrastructure infractions it has been sentenced to death
Otherwise, the council says, something like £10,000 would have to be spent accommodating its needs to the requirements of road traffic and pedestrians. In a cul-de-sac. Can this be right?
Last week, in a bid to save this particular tree, the Woodland Trust and Trees for Cities released a report, based on independent research conducted by a nationally reputed engineer, which concluded that the Vernon Oak, a healthy tree, did not need to be felled, and required no measures to retain it at all. This makes the council’s £10,000 a wild overestimation.
So how many other healthy specimens have been wrongly condemned, based on similar miscalculations and faulty reasoning? Overall, how can the leaders of a major city find themselves locked into a PFI deal with their commercial partners which results in such wanton destruction of a precious natural resource? Everyone but the council and their contractors is desperate to save Sheffield’s trees. The council just seems desperate.
Trees do need a certain amount of maintenance. They shed leaves every year, which have to be swept up, and trees which are diseased, dangerous or dead have to be cut back or even cut down. But avoiding those costs by getting rid of trees now is to elevate financial considerations above everything else. Plastic trees or no trees at all might be cheaper still, but I don’t want to put ideas into anybody’s head.
Around the world trees are being lost through climate change, logging and deforestation
Trees in this country are threatened by a catalogue of new diseases, pathogens and conditions such as ash dieback, acute oak decline, sudden oak death, the oak processionary moth, plane tree wilt, red band needle blight, the pine tree lappet moth, Asian longhorn beetle, bleeding chestnut canker and so on.
A pretty gruesome list which, sadly, Sheffield City Council seems determined to join.
Clive Anderson is a broadcaster and president of the Woodland Trust

Seventeen years ago, a song called ‘The Trees’ was among the final singles released by Jarvis Cocker’s much-loved band Pulp. Now one of Sheffield’s most-famous sons is playing an increasingly-prominent role in the growing campaign to save thousands of the city’s street trees from the axe.
It has been announced that Cocker will be one of the main speakers at a protest rally against Sheffield Council’s controversial tree-felling work this weekend – an event organisers hope is going to attract over 1,000 people and be one of the largest demonstrations they have organised against the policy, which has been in operation since 2012 as part of a 25-year highways maintenance contract with a company called Amey, part of Spanish infrastructure services giant Ferrovial.
Organiser Dave Dillner says the Get Off My Tree march through Sheffield city centre on Saturday morning is designed to show the council and Amey that campaigners “are not going to go away” following a pause in felling work being ordered in the wake of growing protests and intense national political pressure in recent weeks.
It follows dozens of police officers and private security guards being sent out to support felling operations since late February, with multiple arrests of people including a retired fireman, a newly-ordained vicar and a French magician. One woman was arrested for repeatedly blowing a toy horn at a recent protest.
Cocker no longer lives in South Yorkshire but is back in the area this weekend to play two gigs in the Peak District on Friday and Saturday night.
Last month, he performed a DJ set at a fundraising gig to help cover the legal costs facing two protesters who owe £27,000 to Sheffield Council for breaching a High Court injunction banning ‘direct action’ protests where people stand directly underneath threatened trees to prevent them being felled. Prior to the gig, Cocker told Radio 4’s Today programme that the council’s felling programme is “very daft”.
A year-long Freedom of Information battle has recently resulted in the Information Commissioner forcing Sheffield Council to reveal its contract with Amey includes a target to replace 17,500 of the city’s 36,000 street trees.
The council insist the number is not a target but instead a form of ‘insurance’ against potential major disease outbreaks among the city’s tree population. It estimates around 10,000 trees will be felled and replaced with saplings over the course of the contract. The council says a “financial adjustment” will be made at the end of the contract in 2037 if fewer than 17,500 trees are removed but it cannot yet say how such a change will work in practice as Amey “aren’t paid to replace individual trees”.
Cocker is far from the only prominent musician from the city to be backing the campaigners, who argue that many healthy trees in the city are being removed unnecessarily. Former Pulp bandmates Nick Banks and Richard Hawley are also supporting the campaign, along with Reverend and The Makers and the Everly Pregnant Brothers.
Other speakers at Saturday’s event are due to include BBC Countryfile contributor ‘Tree Hunter’ Rob McBride and Professor Matthew Flinders, director of the Sir Bernard Crick Centre for the Public Understanding of Politics at the University of Sheffield.
Mr Dillner, founder of the Sheffield Tree Action Groups, which combines local campaigns across the city, said: “The aim is to make a statement to Sheffield City Council and keep up the pressure, which has been really mounting in this last few weeks. It is about saying ‘We are not going away’. There are many people who are beginning to have the response that what STAG have been saying all along is the truth.”
The Sheffield tree-felling saga has made headlines around the world, with recent articles appearing in The New York Times and El Mundo, one of Spain’s largest newspapers
Environment Secretary Michael Gove has accused Sheffield Council of “environmental vandalism”, while Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is supporting an offer made by his Shadow Environment Secretary Sue Hayman to act as a mediator in potential talks between the council and protesters to try and resolve the situation.
Influential union leaders in Sheffield who previously accused STAG of “an astonishing lack of perspective and navel-gazing” and suggested the campaign was about protecting house prices last week passed a motion calling for “an immediate, mediated settlement to the felling of Sheffield street trees” and added that the use of dozens of police officers and security guards at tree-felling operations had caused “appalling negative publicity nationally for the city”.
When a partial pause in the felling programme was announced last week by Sheffield Council, the authority said “increasingly dangerous tactics” from protesters had led to the decision.
The march on Saturday will see protesters meet at Sheffield City Hall from 9.45am before the demonstrations starts at 10am

Around 200 residents and campaigners came outin force on Wednesday 4 April to show their opposition to the possible felling of trees planted in memory of the First World War.
Sheffield City Council and its contractor Amey are chopping down public trees in the city. Local residents aren’t happy because of the environmental impact, the “Thatcherite” behaviour of the Labour council, and public health concerns.
The council paused the tree-felling programme on 26 March. As The Guardian reported, it said it was doing this due to:
The actions of a handful of people unlawfully entering the safety zones where tree replacement work is being carried out.
But amid the quietening of the chainsaws, one street is still very much making a noise
Western Road in Sheffield is home to the city’s First World War memorial trees. Originally, 97 were planted on 4 April 1919 in memory of the pupils of Western Primary School who fought in the war. But over the years, this number has reduced to 54.
In December 2017, the council voted to fell 23 of these which came under its “replacement category”. It claimed that the cost of remedying problems surrounding the trees was too much. But as The Yorkshire Post reported, there were angry scenes on the day of the meeting, with residents shouting “shame!” at the Labour-led council.
So now, on the anniversary of the trees’ planting, people came out to show their concern and support for Western Road’s memorial.
Former Green Party leader Natalie Bennett was out showing solidarity:
Others, meanwhile, pointed to the large turnout:
Overall, the council is felling 41 memorial trees across Sheffield, and planting 300 more. 60% of residents surveyed, though, thought the felling would be “out of keeping with the intent of the memorial”. As artist Dan Llywelyn Hall told The Star:
Each tree was planted to represent an individual. They are more than living street furniture.
But the large public display of disquiet is not just over the First World War trees. The anger in Sheffield runs deeper than that.
As The Canary has been documenting, Sheffield Tree Action Groups (STAG) are campaigning against the felling of trees around Sheffield. The city’s Labour-led council is undertaking a 25-year, £2bn highway maintenance programme which includes the care and felling of trees. There have been ongoing protests from STAG, opposition councillors, and residents over the programme.
These demonstrations have been highly charged: one saw two pensioners arrested, and another saw local residents reportedly face off against over 30 police officers, private security, and heavy plant machinery. Since then, the council has been forced to publish documents which campaigners claim are a “smoking gun”. They say it shows the council had a target of felling 17,500 trees all along – something the council denies.
During this saga, the council took three campaigners to court to prevent them taking “unlawful direct action or from encouraging others to take direct action” against the tree felling.
After a judge ruled in favour of the council, it is now reportedly seeking costs from two of the campaigners – Alastair Wright and Calvin Payne – of £11,000 and £16,000 respectively. Supporters of the pair have set up a crowdfunding campaign to cover these costs.
While the felling has paused, people’s emotions in Sheffield still run high. And the public support for Western Road’s trees shows that the issue remains one of the most contentious facing the council.
Get Involved!

One morning late last summer, I awoke to the sound of a chainsaw angrily working its way through one of the large mature trees that overhang my back garden. I went out in my pyjamas to remonstrate with the chainsaw wielders, who, two houses down, were now hacking away at a hundred-year-old specimen. Initially they refused to talk to me, but they eventually relented: the tree’s roots had destroyed a wall, the owner of the house was fed up, he would plant a sapling, it was none of my business, this wasn’t a conservation area, and the tree in question was, in any case, “an unpleasant species”. “Humans are an unpleasant species”, I muttered to no one in particular, and went back inside, where, as the day wore on, I tried to shut out the terrible noise of splitting branches, the sickening thud as they fell to the ground – the end result, to my mind, being equal to the carnage left by a particularly bloody, if ultimately one-sided, battle.
Unable to identify this particular species of tree, I could not testify to its inherent unpleasantness – I only knew that it was first in my line of vision when I opened my eyes every morning, and that in summer the pigeons would bounce contentedly on its branches. By early evening, the deed was done, and nature seemed to retreat: the birds’ twittering became subdued, and they called to each other in puzzlement, as if from very far away.
Less than 200 miles from where I live in north London, my isolated and half-hearted protest has been replicated with much more fervour dozens of times over the past few years. In 2012, Sheffield’s Labour-controlled council signed an agreement with the private contractor Amey to fell thousands of street trees deemed diseased, dying or obstructive. A Save Sheffield Trees campaign was mounted in response, claiming that healthy trees were routinely being felled. The increasingly toxic daily stand-offs between the city’s residents and the police and security guards deployed on behalf of the council, it says in response to “increasingly dangerous tactics” by a handful of people, have escalated to such an extent that they bring to mind the miners’ strike of the mid-1980s. (The conflict has been dubbed “our Orgreave” by some, in reference to that pivotal confrontation between police and pickets in June 1984.)
I grew up in Sheffield during this period, and while those unfamiliar with the city may struggle to conceive of it as a place of arboreal bliss, that is precisely my own experience. Ironically, the same council that dubbed Sheffield the “greenest city in Europe” now threatens up to half of its 36,000 street trees (according to a recent freedom-of-information revelation); these are trees that grace and protect streets with names of lyrical cadence: Hangingwater, Ringinglow, Abbeydale, Endcliffe, Ranmoor, Whirlow, Beauchief. In Chelsea Park in Nether Edge, while supposedly revising for A-levels, I committed to memory much of the poetry of John Berryman, his “small trees in mist / far down an endless green” easily relatable to the wooded vista before me. This tiny park lies around the corner from the scene of one of the more urgent Save Sheffield Trees protests: that against the removal of the Chelsea Road Elm, a Huntingdon Elm which houses a rare White-letter Hairstreak butterfly colony. Other trees – some of which, among them “Vernon Oak” and “Duchess Lime”, have been given their own Twitter handles – have not held out as long. In Western Road, Crookes, trees planted to commemorate local people who died in the First World War are also under threat.
Last week the Guardian reported that a woman had been detained by police for playing a (red) plastic trumpet too close to the “designated safety zone”. The deployment of thirty police officers to remove a few protesters at a time of squeezed public services might be one of the reasons the local community has united against its council. Another is that they feel unheard, and excluded from the decision-making process. As the nature writer Patrick Barkham commented in the Guardian last September: Sheffield shares with other UK city councils “a tragic inability to see street trees as an asset rather than a liability. They’re also ignominiously failing to use new tools at their disposal to calculate the real value of their trees”. It was not always so dismal. Many urban green spaces, particularly in the manufacturing centres of the industrial North which flourished throughout the nineteenth century, owe their existence to the city’s metal trades. In Sheffield the dominance of the cutlery industry earned it the sobriquet “Steel City” (some tree protesters are now renaming it “Stump City”, which may well stick). These landowners set aside woodlands and gardens for recreational use, for the safeguarding of biodiversity – a small attempt at offsetting the grime, soot and poor housing.
Now, it seems, those gifts are being revoked in the crudest way imaginable. Sheffield has always been far from utopian, of course, although it has frequently attracted those with independent minds and alternative lifestyles. Essentially it is two cities in one (which goes some way to explaining the narrowness of its vote in favour of Leave in the 2016 referendum); the grand villas and elegant botanical gardens that John Betjeman referred to as part of Sheffield’s “sylvan expansion” in his woozy poem “An Edwardian Sunday, Broomhill, Sheffield” contrast sharply with the 1960s high-rise estates such as the brutalist, now Grade II-listed, Park Hill. Among those objecting to the tree-felling programme are the Sheffield musicians Richard Hawley and Jarvis Cocker, and Secretary of State for the Environment Michael Gove (the Labour leadership, perhaps nervous of weighing in against Sheffield’s cash-strapped council, remains conspicuously silent).
Hawley is writing a musical about Park Hill, to be staged next year at the Crucible Theatre, which in 1966 saw an earlier part of Sheffield’s history recreated in The Stirrings in Sheffield on Saturday Night, a spirited musical dramatization of the Grinders’ Union strike of the 1860s. Twenty years before, in 1840, Sheffield had been the backdrop to an early Chartist uprising. I like to think of it as a place of rebellion still, and hope this latest incarnation of its spirit will prevail. For now – the council says for safety reasons but perhaps also under public and media pressure or, more cynically, with an eye to May’s local elections – the tree-felling programme has been paused (apart from “essential” works). There is talk of a “people’s audit” to hold the council to account. The Save Sheffield Trees movement’s hashtag #theworldiswatching shows this battle to be a litmus test for other UK cities: a frustrated population is fighting against urban deforestation and the myopic vision of those in charge. “The hand that signed the paper felled a city”, wrote Dylan Thomas. “Hands have no tears to flow”.
Catherine Taylor is a freelance writer and critic currently working on The Stirrings, a cultural memoir of Sheffield in the 1970s and 80s.

No Felling(ish!)
No felling this week anywhere in Sheffield, which is incredibly good news.
We say no felling, there was the felling of one tree on Sheldon Road, however this was a tree that was causing proven (after two years of monitoring) structural damage to a house, something the campaign has known about for a year now, so the felling was uncontested. It once again shows the reasonableness of campaigners if hard evidence is shared transparently with us!
So why was there no other felling? The Council and Amey announced another pause in felling for a “couple of weeks.” In their press statement, the reason given was due to the danger posed to Amey staff from campaigners. This clearly isn’t the real reason, but it begs the question what was? There have been a number of theories posed. Just a few include:
There is also the question of how long the pause will be for. Could it be permanent, and mark a change in attitude, with a move to open and transparent discussion and engagement with the community? From the Council press statement, it clearly doesn’t look like it. Our personal view is that Council has really felt huge media heat and are under extreme pressure, but that they have made the classic move of trying to sound more reasonable in announcing a pause to allow that heat to dissipate, before returning to felling in a few weeks’ time. Let’s hope not!.
Like we always say, as a campaign we need to be using the pause in a useful way. That could be to recharge our batteries, but to also to continue to pressure the Council, Amey, the Police and Acorn in many other ways.
Future Key Events:
In the coming week there are two events your presence would be greatly appreciated at:
1) Wednesday 4th April at 1pm on Western Road – The Sunday Times is writing a huge expose of the crazy situation and would like at many campaigners as possible to turn up to Western Road at that time/day for a huge photo opportunity;
2) Saturday 7th April at 9.45am outside Sheffield City Hall – STAG founder Dave Dillner has organised this large rally. Those attending will march around town and back to the City Hall to hear speakers. These include prominent people from the Arboricultural, Environmental and Ecological professions, as well as people from the world of entertainment, including Jarvis Cocker!
And that’s all for this week. Enjoy the Easter Bank Holiday Weekend.

People are extremely upset about healthy trees being chopped down in one of Europe’s greenest cities as part of a PFI deal. Here’s everything you need to know about the ongoing saga
Healthy trees in one of Europe’s greenest cities are being chopped down as part of a PFI deal, and locals are very upset about it.
In recent weeks, you may have seen pictures and video of pensioners chained to trees, or being arrested for blowing a small plastic trumpet
It all started when Sheffield City Council signed off on a £2.2bn Private Finance Initiative contract in 2012.
The 25 year ‘Streets Ahead’ contract, to be delivered by Amey plc, is for highway, pavement and street light renewal, but also includes the management of Sheffield’s highway trees.
Any tree that is judged as dangerous, diseased, dead, dying, damaging or discriminatory, is subject to be felled.
But the policy’s provoked a huge backlash with protesters angry over how the council have come to conclusions on which trees should be chopped down.
Environmental Secretary Michael Gove said on Sunday he would “do anything” to stop what he described as “environmental vandalism”.
So why is it controversial, how many trees are being felled, and why have the government stepped in?
Here’s everything you need to know about Treegate.
Last week the council confirmed, through information obtained via FOI request, that it is aiming to replace around half of Sheffield’s trees
This means that 17,500 will be felled when the contract ends in 2037.
If fewer than the 17,500 trees are felled then a “financial adjustment” between the council and Amey will have to be made.
The council insists that the figure is not a target, insisting that 10,000 will face the chop and be replaced by tree samplings planted across the city.
But tree campaigners say that many of these trees are healthy and are being removed unnecessarily.
5,500 trees have already been chopped down.
It’s led to a series of stand-offs between protestors, contractors, private security staff and police, with a court injunction imposed as a result.
Amey is an infrastructure support service provider, and works in the private and public sector selling services such as highways maintenance and facilities management.
The company won the bidding for the PFI contract ahead of fellow construction giant Carillion.
Its workers are the ones who undertake felling activities across Sheffield.
The term PFI describes any private sector involvement in public services.
If the council decided to fell the trees themselves then it would be the taxpayer who would foot the bill.
(Image: Yorkshire Post / SWNS.com)
Campaigners have been taken away in police vans for obstructing the work of tree fellers.
A majority of the arrests have taken place under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Earlier this month South Yorkshire Police deployed its Protest Removal Team for only the second time in its 12 year history, in an attempt to remove a campaigner crouching under a cherry picker.
The police’s chief constable, Simon Watson, has said that the force “regrets” that tree protests have led to the arrests of “decent people”, adding that the police had “bent over backwards” not to take people away.
Around 25 people have been arrested since the start of the year.
Just last week a 57-year-old woman was arrested for blowing a small plastic trumpet at police officers during a protest.
The campaigner set off a rape alarm, after telling police that the council’s contractors were “raping the trees”.
Then the following day a woman with a broken arm and a pink glittery recorder was also arrested while trying to halt the destruction of a lime tree.
She was a group of about 40 “tree protectors” who demonstrated with an array of noise-making instruments, in solidarity with the trumpet player, before she was taken away by police.
A newly ordained vicar armed with a tambourine was also arrested, reportedly because she chased after the woman with the recorder, who had her car keys.
It comes as another man was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated harassment under the Public Order Act 1986.
Entire residential streets have been effectively “shut down” with scenes of 30 or so police commonplace, alongside riot vans and security guards at various tree fellings.
Two days ago the council announced a temporary halt to its felling programme.
It said that its contractor Amey was “exploring options for completing the work and will present these options to the council.”
Two Labour MPs in Sheffield called for a pause to the felling in the city, in the wake of further arrests of protestors at recent felling sites.
Louise Haigh, MP for Sheffield Heeley, said: “One thing is clear, this dispute cannot be solved by ramping up security. That’s why I believe that the only possible solution is a halt in the fellings and meaningful mediation with local residents going forward.”
While Paul Blomfield, MP for Sheffield Central called for a pause in the work to allow for more discussion to resolve the current conflict, “putting the views of residents on affected streets first.”
It’s the second time that work has been halted, after disturbance between protesters and security staff in January stopped felling for four weeks.
It is not certain why the council made the decision to pause the felling again, but with increased police presence on the streets and local elections on the horizon in May it doesn’t come as a surprise.
Sheffield Tree Action Groups, the main group of campaigners against the felling, make up just under 10,000 people.
People from all backgrounds, from the civil service to local residents, voice their dissent in organised street protests.
Last year a study by mapping firm, Esri UK, found that Sheffield was the sixth greenest city in the UK, with 22.1% of the city’s map made up of greenery.
The Green Party have had representation on the council since 2004, and currently have four councillors.
Former leader of the party Natalie Bennett finished third in the Sheffield Central constituency in the recent general election.
Given the PFI contract ends in 2037 there may be no end in sight.
The council and Amey are currently in talks about the contract and arrests of tree protesters. Any major announcements could be issued after local elections on May 3.
According to Labour Councillor Jack Scott the council would be projected to lose around £300m if they terminated the contract today.
Three days ago it was confirmed that the government wouldn’t step in over the £2.2bn contract.
With 20 years of the contract left thousands of trees are still projected to be felled
Original article:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/what-treegate-everything-you-need-12273031