Lord Scriven demands answers from South Yorkshire Police Chief Constable over city’s tree-felling works


Former Sheffield Council leader Paul Scriven has written back to the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and warned him he was willing to refer him to the police complaints watchdog over the force’s handling of the controversial tree felling programme.
Lord Scriven, now a Lib Dem peer, said Stephen Watson had been ‘vague’ in his reply to an initial letter he sent last week and demanded answers to 12 questions, including whether Mr Watson had actually been to any of the sites where Sheffield Council contractor Amey are replacing trees as part of its £2.2 billion highway improvement contract

He said Mr Watson’s letter raised ‘more questions than answers’ and said he would continue holding him to account ‘even if it meant referring him to the Independent Office for Police Conduct and asking questions in parliament and raising the issue with Home Office ministers’.

Lord Scriven raised 12 points in his latest letter, which he posted on his Twitter feed

They include:

– Had Mr Watson been to a tree felling site and seen what is happening?

– How many complaints have been received against both Amey and protesters and how many were being investigated?

– How many complaints have been made against the police?

– Why have no privacy impact assessments been carried out?

– Who, other than South Yorkshire Police, had seen live streams of the protests sent back to the force’s command control centre?

– How many Sheffield City Council staff are located at South Yorkshire Police during tree felling protests?

– How many meetings have been held with Sheffield Tree Action Groups?

– What does Mr Watson mean by a ‘deterioration in the atmosphere and an increase in criminal behaviour at tree felling protests’?

– How do police decide how many police officers to deploy to tree felling protests?

– What information is exchanged between South Yorkshire Police and/or Sheffield City Council around tree felling?

– Has anyone requested police presence at each incident of tree felling, and, if so, who made the request?

– Why didn’t officers intervene when protesters claimed security staff used undue force? Lord Scriven said he awaited ‘with interest, more detailed replies’ to the questions

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/lord-scriven-demands-answers-from-south-yorkshire-police-chief-constable-over-city-s-tree-felling-works-1-9065239

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News, Uncategorized

Toxic Tea and Other Tales From an English Tree War – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/world/europe/uk-sheffield-trees.html

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Jared O’Mara becomes third Sheffield MP in 24 hours to demand halt to tree-felling work

Sheffield Hallam MP Jared O’Mara has become the third city-based MP within 24 hours to call for a halt to controversial tree-felling work by Sheffield Council.

In a strongly-worded statement sent to The Yorkshire Post this afternoon, Mr O’Mara, who was elected as a Labour candidate last year but is currently suspended from the party pending an investigation into offensive online comments made in his past, said he has seen “innumerable healthy trees which … have been unnecessarily and inexplicably earmarked for felling” in his constituency.

He said Sheffield Council should order an immediate halt to the tree-felling programme and begin talks with residents, following similar comments made by Sheffield Heeley MP Louise Haigh and Sheffield Central MP Paul Blomfield yesterday.

It comes after it was revealed the council’s highways contract with Amey which started in 2012 contains a target to fell 17,500 street trees in the city and replace them with saplings by the end of its 25-year term.

In recent weeks, dozens of police officers and private security guards have been attending tree-felling operations in Sheffield, with heated scenes and several arrests of protesters made.

Mr O’Mara said today: “Over the past few weeks, I have been speaking to a large number of my constituents and keeping abreast of recent developments with Sheffield City Council’s tree-felling programme. Following on from this I am dismayed to learn that there are provisions in the council’s contract with Amey which will allow up to 17,500 trees to
be felled (half of the city’s street based stock) seemingly at the mere whim of a private company.

“I have made no secret of my distaste for the Tree Felling Programme previously and demonstrated this by passing on the protesters’ petition in opposition to it to Jeremy Corbyn last October.

“In addition, I have visited various sites across Hallam and have seen with my own eyes that innumerable healthy trees, which are neither “dangerous, dying, diseased, damaged, dead or discriminatory” (the council’s criteria for removal) have been unnecessarily and inexplicably earmarked for felling

“Furthermore, I have spoken to a sizeable number of my constituents who have expertise in engineering and other relevant disciplines related to the situation at hand. As such, I am calling on the council to immediately cease their tree felling programme in our constituency and speak to these experts and all other residents and campaigners in conjunction with the existing members of the Independent Tree Panel to open an extensive review on a case by case, tree by tree basis to find alternative and affordable engineering solutions.

“The aim being that as many of the remaining trees as possible (hopefully all of them) scheduled for felling can be saved whilst not impeding the council’s road repairing and relaying programme.

“I would be delighted to help with the organisation of such a review and arrange the process and meetings between residents, experts, campaigners, Amey and the Council whereby a mutually agreeable and peaceful solution can be found in each specific instance that is not only affordable for the council but also environmentally friendly.

“Lastly, I would also like to place on record my support of our Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire, Dr Alan Billings, in his view that our Police should not need to be involved in any further protests. This is a civil matter and not a criminal matter and there need not be any more protests in any case if all parties can meet and an extensive review can be undertaken.”

The council says the trees are either dead, dying, diseased, dangerous or damaging the highway. But campaigners argue felling is being carried out for contractual rather than environmental or health and safety reasons.

Sheffield Council insist the 17,500 figure contained in the contract is not a target and it estimates 10,000 trees will be removed and replaced with saplings over the course of the contract.

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/jared-o-mara-becomes-third-sheffield-mp-in-24-hours-to-demand-halt-to-tree-felling-work-1-9065897

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Sheffield MPs urge council to pause tree felling | UK news | The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/15/sheffield-mps-urge-council-to-pause-tree-felling

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees update Monday 12th March –

Another tough week or so on the streets. But despite this, we believe the campaign has never been at a stronger point. Hopefully in reading this email you’ll see why.

The felling crews were out for four out of five days last week. Again with a massive police presence, usually around 30 police at any one point in time. Plus all the usual private security, evidence gatherers, and felling crew. Three roads were targeted. Abbeydale Park Rise (in Dore) on Monday and Friday, Thornsett Road on Tuesday, and Kenwood Road on Thursday. For their efforts, they managed to fell three trees (one on Abbeydale Park Rise, two on Kenwood Road), and take a third of the canopy off a further tree, on Thornsett Road.

All of us were understandably upset on Kenwood Road in particular on Thursday. Hearing the chainsaws and seeing the two lovely Lime trees coming down was heartbreaking. But three and a third trees in a week is grindingly slow progress. There are still 159 threatened trees in Nether Edge and Carter Knowle, and a further 150ish across the rest of the city. At their current rate of progress, that’s around another 100 weeks of felling attempts. Amey, the Police and virtually everyone else knows this. But the Council so far refuse to accept it, wanting to crush the campaign that has caused them so much embarrassment.

More arrests were made last week, including many de-arrests. But it is hard to keep up with the number. Particularly given many of the arrests are based on completely fabricated and/or trumped up charges which are dropped later.

The crazy situation is drawing heavy national media attention. The Daily Mail ran a large article, and BBC investigative journalists have been filming events. The Yorkshire Post has always been very supportive of the campaign and has reported most days. Even the Sheffield Star, which struggles to criticise the Council because of all the advertising funding it receives from them, had a front page headline criticising the current situation.

The situation has again led to the Police and Crime Commissioner, Dr Billings, to say that the situation requires a political solution. It is clear that, whilst the Police are working closely with Amey and Sheffield Council, they are very uncomfortable about this. All of you reading this email should write to the Police and complain about the situation.

Also, after 14 months, the Information Commissioner forced Sheffield Council to release Schedule 2 of the PFI contract in a mostly un-redacted form. This freedom of information request was made in January 2017, and only now has the information we wanted been revealed, thanks to the Information Commissioner’s intervention. Schedule 2 includes all of the targets and performance metrics that Amey are required to meet. It confirms (something we always suspected) that there is a target for perfectly straight kerb lines, with no deviations. This despite it NOT being a legal requirement in Highways Act legislation. In other words, an unnecessary target about straight kerb lines is being used to justify the removal of between 33% and 50% of the already felled and threatened trees.

Another one of the targets revealed in Schedule 2 is that 17,500 street trees will be felled by the end of the 25 year contract. So that’s another 11,800 trees more felled above the ones already felled. In other words, 50% of all Sheffield’s street trees will have been felled by the end of the contract. The Council have said repeatedly on the record that there is no tree felling numbers target, including in court. Clearly the Council have been brazenly lying!

Unfortunately it was unlucky thirteen today for the beautiful tree outside the Bridge Club on Thornsett Road, Netheredge.

Despite having members who support the tree campaign, including the Rustlings Road two, the Bridge Club Committee decided to deny Garden Permission, which could possibly have saved the tree.

One person was arrested while peacefully defending the tree. Over 50 Tree Defenders were spread out around the very large workzone; they joined in chanting led by two people with heroically loud voices.
The attack started shortly after 10am and finished at 5:45pm with tree protestors slow walking in front of the convoy of Acorn trucks and herras barriers as they left. There were fewer police in attendance today, 12 at mid day, plus the CCTV van. Usual number (30) of Yellow jackets plus the 3 man Acorn Arb team to climb and chop.

Do listen on catch up to Brian Lodge on this mornings’ Toby Foster at Breakfast – BBC Radio Sheffield.

I love a comedy turn in the morning.

Eyes on the roads all areas tomorrow.
POWER TO THE PEACEFUL
We are not going away.

Thanks as always for your continued support

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

The Yorkshire Post says: How many trees are to be felled? – Yorkshire Post

THE position of Paul Billington, the council director in charge of Sheffield’s controversial tree-felling programme, is increasingly becoming untenable as The Yorkshire Post today reveals a significant discrepancy between figures he gave to a High Court judge and those forcibly revealed by the Information Commissioner’s Office over the weekend.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the vast majority of street trees in Sheffield are being retained (30,000 out of 36,000),” his witness statement given last summer very clearly states.

It is a number that would be enough to reassure a judge being asked to assess the public impact of the scale of the felling programme, but a number which now bears no resemblance to reality.
In fact, the felling 
number uncovered by the ICO is 17,500 – half of the city’s trees – which is significantly more than Mr Billington stated to the High Court
The council claims this number is not a target, instead suggesting felling 10,000 trees is its aim. This remains 4,000 more than Mr Billington told a court.

Quite why Sheffield’s director of culture and environment underestimated the number of trees that were due to be felled under the Streets Ahead contract is unclear, ergo he now has a responsibility to satisfy residents of Sheffield 
with a credible 
explanation.

Unless he does so, this misguided policy which is now earning national notoriety will prove to be even more damaging to Sheffield’s reputation.

The lack of clarity, transparency and accountability that has gone before has already eroded confidence in both the council and South Yorkshire Police, which also faces serious questions of its own about the heavy-handedness of officers being deployed to assist Amey’s security staff at tree-felling sites.

It is now incumbent upon Mr Billington and Sheffield City Council to explain quite why he was previously so wide of the mark.

Today’s anodyne response from the authority, which does nothing to defend its under-fire director, simply will not do.
Read more at:

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/the-yorkshire-post-says-how-many-trees-are-to-be-felled-1-9059931

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Secret plan to fell half of Sheffield’s street trees revealed

For years, Sheffield City Council has refused to reveal most of its 25-year contract with multinational company Amey. Now, thanks to Freedom of Information Act requests (and an intervention by the Information Commissioner when the Council refused), we know why. Throughout the long-running tree saga, the Council has maintained that felling of trees is a last resort, and that there is no plan to fell any particular number of trees. All the way through, campaigners have suspected otherwise. For many, this has been a key reason they’ve stood under the trees day after day, and even allowed themselves to be assaulted or arrested for doing so. Now we know: the plan is to fell 17,500 trees —roughly half of the street trees in what used to be the greenest city in Europe.

Even as they revealed this information, the Council kept up its lies, insisting that this was not a target. Brian Lodge declared: “any suggestion that 17,500 trees is a target or a requirement is an incorrect interpretation of the contract”. But the language in the contract is clear: “The service provider [Amey] shall replace highway trees in accordance with the annual tree management programme at a rate of not less than 200 per year so that 17,500 highway trees are replaced by the end of the term.”

We know now that felling is not a last resort after exhausting all other options. We had a lot of evidence for this already: In 87% of cases where the Council’s own expert panels recommended saving trees this recommendation has been overruled. In many of these cases the solutions that might save healthy trees were as small as using a different sort of kerbstone. Moreover, the Council has been unable to provide even one instance in which they have used the engineering solutions that are supposedly already paid for in the contract. But it is still a shock to see, right there in black and white, the plan to kill half the city’s street trees.

Why this plan? We don’t know. It may be in part based on a misinterpretation of a survey from 2006. This survey said that 75% of the city’s street trees were “mature or over-mature”, which the Council seems to have interpreted as meaning they need replacement. However, “mature or over-mature” does not mean “in need of replacement”. In fact the surveyor made it very clear that he felt only 1,236 might be in need of replacement.

Another possibility is a bizarre clause in the contract that specifies a need for perfectly straight kerbs. This is not a standard requirement, and its removal would save a large number of trees.

Whatever the reason, it’s been confirmed: we are to have 20 more years of felling, with the end goal of killing half our roadside trees. In the last two weeks, with around 30 private security and 30 police manhandling and arresting pensioners, they have managed to fell 5 trees, 4 of which had most of the branches cut off months ago (and so were more difficult to defend). Is this what they’re planning to keep doing — for 20 years? Already we saw a man knifed to death in broad daylight while 30 police were attending a felling. The city can’t go on this way. It has to admit that this PFI contract is a disaster and find a different way forward.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees campaigner letter to Chief of Police – Getting the balance right

My email to Dr Billings today

Dear Dr Billings

I am writing to express my concern regarding recent arrests of peaceful protesters in Sheffield using low grade traffic legislation, Section 303 of the Highways Act 1980. As I am sure you are aware this carries a maximum fine of £200 and it’s use could be interpreted as rather extreme given the circumstances. It is also extraordinary that the ratio of arrests to actual charges is significantly below the national average.

It appears to me, and I am sure I am not alone, that this is simply a strategy to remove protesters from the scene and restrict their future participation in peaceful protests by the application of severe bail conditions restricting their human rights, as has been applied to similar protests across the UK.

Orgreave and Hillsborough are still fresh in the minds of many Sheffield residents, I fear Streets ahead will soon take on similar feelings of mistrust towards SYP.

The Sheffield Tree campaign has been one of the most peaceful protests, especially given the high levels of emotion amongst those protesting. Many are retired, many are professionals, our opinions are supported by Government Policy on the environment, medical and scientific evidence and industry standards. I urge you to step back and refrain from arresting peaceful residents in such a biased way as has been demonstrated in recent weeks.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Sheffield Council forced to reveal target to remove 17,500 street trees under PFI deal – Yorkshire Post

Sheffield Council has been forced to reveal a hugely-controversial PFI highways maintenance contract contains a target to cut down almost half of the city’s 36,000 street trees and replace them with saplings. The battle to save Sheffield’s trees: Six years on and the fight continues… here’s what you need to know.

Information has been published following a year-long battle by campaigners for non-commercially sensitive parts of the 25-year contract with private company Amey to put placed in the public domain.

The council has previously insisted in Freedom of Information responses that there was no target for tree removal but the new information has come to light after the Information Commissioner ordered the publication of the previously-redacted sections of the contract. The council had claimed it intended to publish the information at a future date but last month the Commissioner warned the authority it could face legal action unless it published the information within 35 days. One passage of the newly-published information states: “The service provider [Amey] shall replace highway trees in accordance with the annual tree management programme at a rate of not less than 200 per year so that 17,500 highway trees are replaced by the end of the term, such replacement to be in accordance with the Highway Tree Replacement Policy, unless authority [Sheffield Council] approval has been obtained for deviation from this policy.” In a statement issued by Sheffield Council, cabinet member for environment Bryan Lodge today said it “remains difficult” to estimate how many trees will be felled over the lifetime of the contract and “any suggestion that 17,500 trees is a target or a requirement is an incorrect interpretation of the contract”. The council has suggested it currently estimates around 10,000 trees will be replaced over the course of the contract.

But tree campaigner Paul Selby, whose complaints to the Information Commissioner about the handling of Freedom of Information requests he was submitting to Sheffield Council led to the information being brought to light, said the publication of new details is a “smoking gun” that proves what campaigners have been saying about planned removal targets. He said Councillor Lodge has not said the council has approved any change from the 17,500 figure mentioned in the contract. “If they had decided to deviate from the contract figure, surely he would have said so,” he said. The council and Amey have previously said around 6,000 trees were going to be cut down and replaced with saplings over the first five years of the contract, which started in 2012. That work has been delayed, partly as a result of protests against felling, and dozens of police officers and private security guards have now been attending felling operations in the city in an attempt to ensure the work is carried out. The council and Amey insist that only dead, dying, diseased and damaging trees are being removed. But campaigners say that many of the trees being removed are healthy and do not need to go – claiming the option is being taken for cost rather than environmental or health and safety reasons.

Councillor Lodge’s statement added the council “continues to aim to minimise the number of trees being replaced”. He said: “It has taken longer than we would have wished, but it was always our intention to release more of the Streets Ahead contract in the wider public interest, through a structured, phased approach and we have been working since April 2017 to achieve this. Two arrested in Sheffield tree protest as police in riot helmets remove campaigner from under vehicle “One of the things people will see is that the contract allows for the replacement of up to 17,500 highway trees. “Over the last two years, the council has been asked many times about the number of trees that will need to be replaced over the life of the Streets ahead contract. In the first five years we have upgraded around 65 per cent of the roads and have replaced around 6,000 trees in that time, including trees that required urgent replacement, sometimes on streets yet to be improved.

“It has always been, and remains, difficult to estimate an exact final figure for the number of trees that will need to be replaced, as tree condition will vary with time, but the figures to date demonstrate that our tree replacement work is not driven by a need to replace a set amount of street trees, but by a measured and restrained approach which guarantees our street trees will flourish in the future. “Any suggestion that 17,500 trees is a target or a requirement is an incorrect interpretation of the contract, and indeed the High Court was clear that the ‘objective of the council has been to retain trees where possible.”

The contract wisely gives the ratepayer ‘insurance cover’ to ensure we aren’t vulnerable to long term risks as the health and impact of our street trees continue to change over time. If for any reason, such as major disease outbreak, the council has to replace a number of trees it can do so without any extra cost to the Sheffield ratepayer. “However, the council continues to aim to minimise the number of trees being replaced. “An independent survey as long ago as 2007 showed that 75 per cent of our street trees were found to be mature or reaching maturity. The replacement trees will help shift the balance towards younger, more diverse street trees which are not causing damage to the highway or private property and causing accessibility problems. What’s more, given we are unable to predict how major potential outbreaks of disease may affect our tree stock in coming years, the diversity of species will help to protect against this. “The Streets Ahead highways programme will see the upgrade of Sheffield’s roads, paths and street lighting and ensure they are maintained to a standard expected of a modern-day city.”

Read this article on Yorkshire Post 

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Chainsaw gang felling one 25ft cherry tree protected by 48 guards

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5483793/amp/Sheffield-trees-Chainsaw-gang-protected-police-protests.html?__twitter_impression=true

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Knife crime and burglaries rise in Sheffield; in non-response, police plan to triple numbers at…

A visitor to Dore or Nether Edge over the last two weeks would be shocked at what’s become of these peaceful residential areas. Entire streets blocked off, an imported army of private security forces in high-viz, 30-some police officers, riot and CCTV vans — a riot shield was even spotted. Further scrutiny, however, would reveal that one day last week the focus of all the attention was three individuals doing nothing but standing next to a wall — two pensioners and a small middle-aged woman. Eventually police gave permission to the security forces to use “reasonable force” on the three of us (I was that middle-aged woman) and that’s when the cries of pain started. But police were on the scene and acted fast. They acted fast, that is, to tell us that we would be summoned to court for a minor violation of section 303 of the Highways Act (the fine is smaller than that for failing to pick up your dog’s poo). This violation was what justified our assault, apparently. After that, they increased their police presence this week in Dore, issuing yet more summonses to dangerous looking grey-haired folk — one of whom they unnecessarily handcuffed then de-handcuffed, apparently in a fit of overzealousness (much as they arrested and then de-arrested the pensioners with me the earlier day).

Police are also knocking on doors and talking homeowners into taking back the permission they have given tree protectors to stand in their gardens. It has been reported that they rang one house, claiming to be from a CCTV unit who had spotted people in the garden, and told the minor who answered the phone that their household insurance could be invalidated if anything went wrong due to the presence of these people. These are not the actions of a police force — police don’t use CCTV to spot actions which might invalidate insurance, and then notify homeowners. These are the actions of people acting as agents for the private corporation that is taking over Sheffield’s streets and destroying its trees.

All this was in service of ensuring that multinational company Amey and its contractor Acorn get to do precisely what they wish to do in Sheffield. What they wish to do is to fell perfectly healthy trees for no good reason, against the wishes of residents. Worse, they do it with absolutely no accountability. The council signed a secret 25-year PFI contract with Amey, and they are now willing to devote a huge proportion of their scarce resouces to enforcing this contract, and to turn our streets into bizarre quasi-militarised zones so that pensioners can be hurt to make sure that the healthy trees are felled.

The police claim that they are acting as objective peace-keepers, equally interested in making sure that laws are followed on all sides. And the individual police offers are courteous and even charming, in general. But assault after assault has been reported to police by protestors and no action taken. This includes video footage of an uppercut punch by an SIA security worker on Meersbrook Park Road several weeks ago — in the presence of police observers. It includes an SIA bouncer gratuitously kicking a bystander, in the presence of witnesses, on Thornsett Road last week. It includes lots of footage clearly showing people, many of them pensioners, crying out in pain as private security assault them. On Meersbrook Park Road some weeks ago, police were on the scene and refused to look in the direction of the assaults. On Thornsett, they had given permission for the use of “reasonable force”. Meanwhile, we have had instance after instance of protestors being arrested and then de-arrested, sometimes in rapid succession and sometimes over a long and stressful period. A protestor was arrested on the spot and held for 11 hours because a barrier man said he thought the protestor had given him two fingers many weeks ago. But when a barrier man gave two fingers to protestors with many witnesses police refused to do anything at all.

Meanwhile, a look at crime reports reveals that watching (or studiously not watching) pensioners get assaulted is really not what police in the area should be doing. At the very moment that dozens of police were on Thornsett Road watching peaceful protests, a house was burgled on nearby Wath Road. But this was not an isolated occurrence. In fact, the area saw a 60% increase in burglaries from December to January, and the Star has just reported on a rash of daytime burglaries in Nether Edge. The focus for police, however, is elsewhere: not on this, nor on those areas with much worse, more violent crime. Instead, they’ve apparently been told to devote their energies and their training to the criminalisation of protest and to facilitating the use of physical force on pensioners.

The police presence has been so disproportionate that yesterday Lord Scriven demanded answers regarding this use of resources, calling for the Chief Constable to be “held to account”. Today we saw a responsefrom Assistant Chief Constable David Hartley. Remarkably, he plans to triple the number of police assigned to protests: “We have seen 90 to 100 protesters and the number officers will replicate that.” He claims to have no choice, while at the same time seemingly conceding that this is a terrible use of resouces.

“We have a myriad of responsibilities — knife crime is on the up, homes are being burgled so the backdrop to that is of course these officers could be better placed elsewhere but the council has a lawful right to carry out this maintenance and we have a duty to be there so we don’t have any other choice.”

South Yorkshire Police seem to be forgetting their own history, including the very recent history of Rustlings Road, when they felt they’d been “thrown under the bus” by the council’s interactions with them over the operation. Stunningly, they are only increasing the extent of their actions to enforce Amey’s contract upon the people of Sheffield, despite real need from citizens for them to be elsewhere.

https://medium.com/@jennifersaul/knife-crime-and-burglaries-rise-in-sheffield-in-non-response-police-plan-to-triple-numbers-at-ecc97df5d700

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees update Thu 8th March – 2 trees felled

Daily News Round-up – March 8th 2018

It’s been a long day for a lot of people

Starting messages:
5:10 am “Look out of the window. Snowing a lot in S2”
7:18 am “Good morning you lovely lot. Welfare van has left the depot. Heras Barrier vans still in yard and other vehicles”

Finishing messages:
7:01pm “Two trees down. 45 minute hold up after they were ready to go home. Quite a few strollers out for an evening constitutional across the road”

A whole lot happened in between.

All morning, there were cat and mouse games with barrier vans and Security vans coming and going.
Is it Abbeydale Park Rise or Kenwood Road?

Then it all kicked off at Kenwood Road at 12:00.

We had the usual complement of Police, SIA Security and Arbs plus the Police and Crime Commissioner Dr Alan Billings and lots of Tree Protectors.

There were barriers, Barrier vans, welfare vans, bunnies under vehicles (forcibly removed), Cherry pickers, songs, chants, sweeties handed round, Riot helmets, politicians, reporters, BBC, Gnomes in Garden Permissions, Gnome in a holly bush, Dog walkers, mothers with babies, school kids walking home after 3pm, people needing to visit the surrounded property and…anger, anguish and… tears.
Tears as everything we did could not prevent the felling of two fine, treasured, valuable trees.

Please have a look at the accounts and video footage on STAG FB page, they tell it all.

POWER TO THE PEACEFUL
WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

The Yorkshire Post says: Answer these questions, Chief Constable, over police response to Sheffield tree protests – Yorkshire Post


IT is this question, posed by law-abiding Sheffield residents, that goes to the core of misgivings about the number of police being deployed to enable council contractor Amey to continue the demolition of trees in the city: how, they want to know, can South Yorkshire Police justify sending 33 uniformed officers to one suburban street to support 20 security officers when it does not routinely despatch patrols to reports of break-ins and vandalism?

This is the thrust of the hard-hitting letter that former council leader Paul Scriven, now a Lib Dem peer, has written to Stephen Watson, the force’s Chief Constable, in which he seeks a full explanation for a Draconian response which appears unsustainable, heavy-handed and out of proportion with the scale of any threat posed to the wider public.
The protesters are not battle-hardened criminals. Far from it. They’re public-spirited citizens exercising their right to peaceful protest because of the contemptible manner in which their views have been ignored by those councillors presiding over the wanton destruction of the local environment
At a time when Mr Watson is tasked with winning back eroded public trust after the South Yorkshire force was brought into national disrepute by a succession of scandals, residents deserve a full explanation of the police tactics, the cost to the public purse and, in light of past events, reassurances that all policing protocols have been correctly followed. Even better would be Sheffield Council halting the destruction of all trees until an independent policy appraisal has been carried out.

Read more at:

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/the-yorkshire-post-says-answer-these-questions-chief-constable-over-police-response-to-sheffield-tree-protests-1-9049785

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees update Wed 7th March – No trees felled

Daily News Round-up – Wednesday March 7th

Today was a good day, no trees felled.

Amey and Acorn dug holes, planted saplings, moved logs, ground stumps, worked on lighting, cleaned pavements, patched footpaths, did good stuff.

Thank you.
We like this.
Have a lovely evening.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees update Tuesday 6th March – no Grinch, lots of action, but no felling

Daily News Round-up – Tuesday March 6th

This morning Yorkshire Water was fixing a leak on Abbeydale Park Rise and Amey’s attentions returned to Thornsett Road, Netheredge.
It was almost déjà vu but at a different tree, with more singing, lots of Gnomes, more chanting, no arrests, no ballroom dancing and no trees felled – again.
The huge Herras “safety zone” completely blocked Thornsett Road. Surrounding and inside it were:
One PC Rick (of impressive moustache fame), two Police Inspectors, three Police Sergeants, two Police Liaison Officers, two Police Evidence Gatherers, twenty three Police Constables, all backed up by numerous Police transport vans and a Police CCTV mobile surveillance centre with a camera mounted high on the biggest periscope I’ve ever seen.
Plus the usual compliment of around 40 Amey/Acorn Yellow jackets and, today, two Amey Senior Management. Senior Management were not totally keen to talk to the many representatives of the press, TV, Radio and a couple of journalism students who all arrived with impressive amounts of recording equipment. Hope we see some good reporting tonight and in the following days.

Megaphones at the ready there was some awesome chanting from a large crowd of Tree Protectors:
“Axe PFIs – Not Trees!”
“Whose Trees? – Our Trees!”
“Whose Police? Our police!”
“Plant Acorns – Don’t employ them”
“Who lives here? – We live here!”
Please feel free to suggest new chants in the comments below.

By mid afternoon the Acorn Arbs had removed the roadside branches from one Chestnut tree that the Independent Tree Panel assessed as “Healthy”. However, the Amey Tree Specialist assessed it today as “Diseased, rotting from within and needing to be felled within two years” Well, who to believe? I’ll leave that up to you…..
There was Garden Permission beside the Chestnut tree (thank you!), which allowed the Gnomes to be under the oversailing branches. Amey were not willing to cut above the heads of the Tree Protectors and we all went home…rather slowly, strolling in front of some big vehicles…

Oh and the singing…we need more songs.
We did have a wonderful rich baritone who led us in a short, but spirited, rendition of “He’s a Lumberjack and he’s OK”. The Amey Lumberjacks were probably not overly pleased with the second line or the suggested clothes choices but we had a good sing.

So, polite peaceful homework for tonight: suggestions for more songs and some creative chants.

POWER TO THE PEACEFULLY TUNEFUL
WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, News

Nicola needed to get to hospital. Tree felling barriers blocked the way.

This is Nicola. She is 65 years old and suffers from MS, as well as a movement disorder which makes her visibly disabled. While attempting to defend trees yesterday, she fell ill and was unable to walk. There were over 60 security operatives and police, who had taken over the street, turning it into a quasi-militarised zone.

Protestors were being dragged away from trees.

Nicola became worried about her presence near a tree, and confused by the conflicting claims that police and security were making to her. She asked two security operatives to help her out of the tree felling zone. They did, but then knocked her over in their zeal to get to another protestor, giving no thought to her medical condition. This video shows the events clearly.

After having been knocked over by security guards, her condition worsened substantially, as she began to have heart palpitations and was unable to move. Although there were around 30 police officers on the scene, there were no medics and it was fellow protestors with first aid training who were monitoring Nicola’s vital signs and checking her condition. The barrier men refused to remove the barrier that was on top of her legs, though the police eventually persuaded them to do this. The police realised she needed to get to a hospital, but could not get her there. There were no ambulances available, and the barriers filling the streets meant that the police vans could not get through. Moreover, the police had no stretchers, although they had authorised the use of force on protestors. So Nicola lay on the cold wet ground as they tried to find a way to get her out. After a very long delay, the barrier men finally moved the barriers, and eventually (the barriers are slow to move) the police were able to carry Nicola to a police van and get her to a hospital.

This is exactly the sort of thing many of us in Sheffield feared would happen. We warned Amey (the contractor) and the Sheffield City Council that blocking off whole streets like this with tall fencing would be a disaster if there was a medical emergency. But this, like so much else, has been ignored. The council ignored its own panels of experts in 87% of the cases in which they recommended keeping trees (by using techniques like a thinner kerbstone), and have forged ahead with felling healthy trees, even when this is against the overwhelming wishes of residents, and even at the cost of residents’ safety (as this case illustrates).

The street where this incident happened was no ordinary street, and the trees being fought for were no ordinary trees: this street is famous for the Christmas lights it puts in its trees, to raise money for charity. The residents overwhelmingly wanted to keep these trees, which are part of a beloved annual tradition, and which were originally paid for by donations from residents, many of whom still live on the street, in their 80s and 90s.

But that is of no consequence to the Labour-led council. Despite the fact the Labour party nationally is now strongly opposed to PFI contracts like their contract with Amey, they will apparently do anything to enforce the wishes of the private contractor. Neither they nor Amey have been able to give coherent answers for why all the expert advice is being ignored in order to fell healthy trees against residents’ wishes, but that is what they are insisting on doing — at any cost. They demonise protestors like Nicola, insisting that vast security forces and police presence are needed. Then, having built up the idea that protestors like Nicola are dangerous thugs, they seem utterly unable to see them as vulnerable citizens in need of medical attention — even when they are lying on the ground unable to move and trapped under a barrier.

This is not how a Labour government should behave: allowing a private company to insist on destroying the trees of the greenest city in Europe, against expert advice and residents’ wishes; turning its streets into quasi-militarised zones; demonising peaceful protestors; and continuing, day after day, to waste scarce resources to do all this. Other councils are pulling out of their contracts with Amey. Sheffield could do so without penalty. Why don’t they? The Inside Out programme has already begun asking difficult questions, as has the Yorkshire Post. These questions only get more pressing as it becomes clearer what vast lengths the council will go to. Let’s just hope more people aren’t injured in the process.

(To urge Sheffield to rescind the contract without penalty, go here.)

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

EXCLUSIVE: Sheffield councillor Lord Scriven demands answers over South Yorkshire Police’s handling of tree protests

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/exclusive-sheffield-councillor-lord-scriven-demands-answers-over-south-yorkshire-police-s-handling-of-tree-protests-1-9049756

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

Sheffield tree-felling saga: Man arrested and woman injured as dozens of police and security staff descend on suburb

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/sheffield-tree-felling-saga-man-arrested-and-woman-injured-as-dozens-of-police-and-security-staff-descend-on-suburb-1-9048770

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News

#saveshefftrees update Mon 5th March – Grinch who stole Xmas is back with his new mates

Daily News Round Up – Monday March 5th

Abbeydale Park Rise – targeted today.

Early this morning the very first presence on APR was an Amey vehicle, probably checking the condition of the road. Then there arrived a parking services car, tow truck and 4×4. A car was moved.
10am saw the arrival of a massive convoy of vehicles; Barriers wagons, “welfare” mini bus for the Amey workers, chippers, lorries to collect the chips from the chippers, police vans and various Amey cars and vans. Out of this convoy poured more than 30 police and over 40 Amey Yellow Jackets; Arbs, SIA operatives, Evidence Gatherers, Barrier men, an Ecologist and assistant. It seems a significant number of police officers there today were from Doncaster who were brought in today on their day off. Evidently, they were asked to volunteer but several said it was “forced” volunteering.

Amey barrier men set up Herras barriers at the bottom three trees. Then took down Herras barriers at two of them; the ecologist there said there was a birds nest in one tree and the other one opposite was too close to the nest to allow felling. This left one tree with Herras barriers around it and a Gecko in the hedge.

11:15am A Slow protest walk began and just happened to be in front of the Herras barrier van, and other vehicles, Amey wanted to move up the road. Eventually there were over 20 Tree Protectors having a lovely stroll back and forth across the road.
Meanwhile Acorn Arbs hand sawed and lopped the roadside canopy off the first tree they had set up around at the bottom of the road. While the Arbs sawed away two residents protected the tree where it oversailed their property by climbing up ladders and leisurely pruning the Holly beside the threatened tree.

12:30pm Back at the slow walk…after a little over an hour, and about 10 metres moved, the police decided to form a thin yellow line and “kettle” all the strolling tree Protectors up and to one side of the road. Several people fell down and two ladies felt unwell and, after a rest on the road, moved out of the kettled area. Once the police had most people to the side of the road a charming Frenchman sat down and played his Guitar and sang. This prompted an outbreak of “Strictly Come Protesting” Ballroom Dancing, very elegant.

13:00 onwards… Barrier wagons were brought in from the top end of the road. After setting up around a tree that was not on any threatened list (we did tell them…) the crew finally managed to get barriers up at three more trees, all part felled trees they had previously attacked.

Geckos got in everywhere, Gnomes stood in garden permissions and a French squirrel stood triumphant in a tree while the admiring crowd sang their version of La Marseillaise.

Yorkshire Mix sweeties were offered to all; we are an equal opportunity Tree Protecting Protest group.

By the end of the afternoon:
No more work had been done on any of the trees. All day only tree branches were removed from the one tree at the bottom of the road.

One person had been arrested for not giving their name quickly enough and we think the policeman was impatient and wanted to practice his handcuff technique. Once arrested the person was de-arrested. They may get a summons for a 303 Highways offence.

A second person gave their details quickly enough when asked and avoided the handcuffs. They were told to expect a summary charge for breach of 303 of the highways act. Not a recordable offence, should they be found guilty.

A third person was arrested, not quite sure why, possibly impersonating a nesting French hen.

A woman inside an incomplete zone collapsed after being removed. She was eventually taken to hospital in a police van as the ambulance service said there would be 4 hour wait. We understand that she is recovering well in hospital.

Please look on the STAG FB page for some interesting videos, pictures and descriptions of today’s events on APR and everything we’ve missed. It was a busy day…
POWER TO THE PEACEFUL.
WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, News

#saveshefftrees update w/e 2nd March

FB_IMG_1519847363931

A quite incredible week for the campaign, one that will live long in memories.

Felling news:

For three days, Monday to Wednesday, around 30 police supported around 30 “yellow jackets” (private security, evidence gatherers, barrier crews and felling crews) came to Thornsett Road to fell trees. Between 30 and 50 campaigners tried to stop the felling on those three days, and whilst two trees were lost, one of which was diseased, the defensive action was very successful. Two trees in three days given the huge costs of hiring the Police and private security is certainly no success for Amey.

Over the course of the week, ingenious tactics were used by campaigners, nearly all of which were entirely legal. There were arrests, but there were also “de-arrests” as a result of campaigners being improperly arrested. There was also more violence from SIA security, with lots of people reporting it to the Police.

By Thursday the snow and ice was so bad that Amey chose not to even try felling in the final two days of the week. We imagine they will be regrouping and re-thinking again, as I expect they believed they’d be able to perhaps fell up to 10 trees in the course of the week.

As things stand, we are not aware of any new parking restriction notices for next week, so only the existing ones apply, which end after Monday.

As per updates earlier in the week, the key to the success of the defensive action this week was lots of people being on the road ahead of the felling crews arriving. On Wednesday, because of repeat callouts from 8am, by 10.15am, when the felling crews arrived, 40 campaigners were on the road.

We need this again in the coming weeks. If you receive a callout from the emergency tree phone, don’t assume there are enough people already on the road. If you have time, even if only an hour, please attend yourself. The more people the better, it really does make a difference. And don’t forget you don’t have to be in the thick of the action to be useful. Simply videoing and photographing events, acting as a witness is absolutely critical.

Recent Public Meeting and Politics:

On a slightly different note, at the Public Meeting on Monday, we held a discussion about how political Save Nether Edge Trees (SNET) should be. The reason we did this was because of what happened last June. All the tree campaign groups, since they were established in 2015, have done their best to not be political at all. So in the Nether Edge by-election in June 2017, SNET took the decision not to endorse the most street tree positive candidate, instead remaining broadly neutral. Robin Unwin (Green Party) was the most street tree positive candidate but lost by just over 100 votes. The Labour Party were fearful of losing the council seat, and the fact they won, despite all the tree controversy, gave them huge confidence to continue the felling. Every time a campaigner meets a Council official or Councillor, they bring this up. In hindsight, many of us believe that if SNET had campaigned proactively for Rob, he would have won, and this would have worried the Labour Party sufficiently to think again about some of their actions. We may be wrong in this analysis, but we have strong reasons to believe we are right.

So on that basis, we held the discussion/debate at the Public Meeting. It was a really positive debate. The broad thrust of most points made were that the whole tree campaign and PFI issues are absolutely political, even if they aren’t necessarily party political. So the tree campaign cannot avoid being political. The broad consensus in the room was that we should not stray into being party political, but should support and campaign for the most tree positive candidate, if not their party.

Some in the room did point out that as well as seeking external political change (ie change of party leading the Council), action was needed to achieve internal political change (change within the current Labour led Council). That is what the No Stump City initiative is trying to achieve, with lots of success so far. As a result, SNET continue to support and promote No Stump City activities.

“Love Sheffield” Initiative:

On a similar theme, you’ll note we have been promoting Its Our City. A similar and related initiative is something called “Love Sheffield.” It’s aim is to use social media to introduce local people to the leading “alternative to Labour” candidate, to try to encourage floating voters to pick someone different, and to ultimate achieve a greater balance at the overall Council. For more information, visit www.lovesheffield.net

“Get Off Our Tree” Campaign Support Concert:

Of course, there are lots of other things going on it the campaign. There is the concert called Get Off Our Tree being held on 16th March at City Hall. Jarvis Cocker, Richard Hawley, the Everly Pregnant Brothers and others have organised this themselves to support the campaign, quite incredible.

Really important Petition:

Also, a reminder about the petition you REALLY need to sign if you haven’t already. Think about the fact that Amey repeatedly gritted Thornsett Road to allow felling, yet didn’t clear snow or grit many of the main arterial roads, causing issues for the emergency services. Do you want this company continuing to “maintain” road in our city for the next 20 years? Please sign.

https://www.change.org/p/petition-to-rescind-the-streets-ahead-pfi-contract-with-amey-hallam-highways-ltd

Save Fitzalan Square Petition:

Sheffield City Council are planning to redevelop Fitzalan Square in Sheffield City Centre. The plans include felling the 4 healthy mature plane trees that surround the statue of King Edward VII. These are the only remaining mature trees in the city centre and must be retained.  Fitzalan Square suffers from poor air quality due to traffic pollution. The London Plane trees are particularly effective at removing pollutants from traffic-heavy areas like this in the city centre.
The trees are one of the few things of beauty in a Square currently noted for its ugly betting shops, proliferation of litter and intrusive advertising boards.
The trees provide a great deal of biodiversity to the square including birds and insects which would be lost despite the planting of new saplings. Please support here

And that’s all folks. Thanks as ever for your continued support, this icy cold week in particular, many of your support has been incredible.

Keep up to speed with #saveshefftrees news on Facebook here and Twitter here.

 

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Blog, Healthy Felling, News
The Felling – An Epic Tale of People Power

Innocent protest to save Sheffield’s healthy street trees turns into a nightmare, as a small group of brave suburbanites take on their Council, the police and a multinational corporation.

Crowdfunder: street trees legal fund

We are currently collecting to support the small number of campaigners who are facing court costs after cases brought by Sheffield City Council.

Heartwood TiCL trail

Walk the Heartwood Trail and find Robert Macfarlane’s beautiful charms against harm hung from some of Sheffield’s threatened Street Trees. Designed by Jackie Morris.